Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why I don't think the Supreme Court will take up the Pennsylvania case [View all]The Velveteen Ocelot
(130,497 posts)18. They don't owe him anything. Once they have their lifetime appointments
they don't have to do a damn thing for him. Just ask Eisenhower's ghost about Earl Warren.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why I don't think the Supreme Court will take up the Pennsylvania case [View all]
StarfishSaver
Nov 2020
OP
If vote certification is not granted the states electoral votes are then Dropped from the 270
Thekaspervote
Nov 2020
#41
They won't rule at all, because the court will refuse to hear the case. Nt
Fiendish Thingy
Nov 2020
#34
Wasn't the SC decision in 2000 that the client, Bush, would be damaged if the recount continued?
spike jones
Nov 2020
#56
Nothing will happen. Justices are appointed for life, so no matter what Trump does
The Velveteen Ocelot
Nov 2020
#8
They don't owe him anything. Once they have their lifetime appointments
The Velveteen Ocelot
Nov 2020
#18
Neil Katyal solicitor gen for President Obama says no, SCOTUS will not get involved
Thekaspervote
Nov 2020
#38
We will know tomorrow when PA is likely certified and Michigan and Arizona as well.
Demsrule86
Nov 2020
#42
And these are the same people who fought tooth and nail for states NOT to be required to inform
StarfishSaver
Nov 2020
#25
(1) They sued the wrong people. (2) Their remedy wasn't appropriate for their injury
struggle4progress
Nov 2020
#30
There are other pesky little details, such as lack of standing and the fact
struggle4progress
Nov 2020
#44
Who wouldn't want to take up a case about Zombie Chavez working with the CIA?
Major Nikon
Nov 2020
#32
They won't touch it because to do so would render SCOTUS impotent and irrelevant
Fiendish Thingy
Nov 2020
#33