Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Happy Hoosier

(9,465 posts)
49. I'm not a lawyer, but I read Judge Brann's ruling.
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 12:35 AM
Nov 2020

And I cannot see him granting a temporary injunction, even if the district court ruled that the district court had to permit the second Amendment. I’ll try to find a link to the second amended complaint for you.... you’ll be... amazed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

do-overs til we get what we want? SleeplessinSoCal Nov 2020 #1
Pretty much. n/t Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #5
DU lawyers, please explain this move because I don't get it. TeamPooka Nov 2020 #2
They know what the failures in their original pleading were - Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #8
Thank you very much Ms Toad. That explaination was very clear. TeamPooka Nov 2020 #44
Marc Elias has no idea why trump is doing this Gothmog Nov 2020 #54
They plan to amend around the failures in the earlier claim - Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #3
How do they amend around lack of standing? Happy Hoosier Nov 2020 #46
I haven't seen a copy of it - but it wouldn't surprise me Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #48
I'm not a lawyer, but I read Judge Brann's ruling. Happy Hoosier Nov 2020 #49
Judge Brann seemed to be covering all the bases, Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #50
Here's the proposed second amended complaint if you car to see it. Happy Hoosier Nov 2020 #51
Thanks! Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #52
So far I see pole watching, and depravation of rights . . . Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #55
It makes no damn sense. The lawsuit has been dismissed. Statistical Nov 2020 #4
Almost certainy futile, but not incompetent Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #11
Interesting. I think the judge will deny it all but worth a shot. Statistical Nov 2020 #17
Since permitting amendments afer the first is within the court's discretion, Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #18
I think Trump most likely loses this appeal, but he at least has a small chance, unlike with Alhena Nov 2020 #20
Agreed. n/t Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #32
It's both futile and incompetent StarfishSaver Nov 2020 #19
I'll go along with at least likely incompetent - since he seemed completely unaware Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #34
In my ignorance of the law, this sounds to me like whistling for the garbage truck to back up Croney Nov 2020 #6
If they had put 1/8 of this effort into mitigating the pandemic, this country would be wide open and soothsayer Nov 2020 #7
Let me be the judge in this one... jmowreader Nov 2020 #9
And with double prejudice. ananda Nov 2020 #10
Not quite. Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #12
Correct Alhena Nov 2020 #22
Yeah and Usually You Have to Attach the proposed Amended Complaint to the Motion for Leave Stallion Nov 2020 #26
Since he seemed to be unaware that he needed to seek leave of court Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #30
But the case was dismissed with prejudice, so how are they going to The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2020 #13
How are they going to pull 70,000 Trump votes out of thin air? jmowreader Nov 2020 #14
Well, if the appeals court reverses the judge's order dismissing the case with prejudice then it's Alhena Nov 2020 #16
But they're not appealing the dismissal StarfishSaver Nov 2020 #21
Yes, but if that appeal is granted then it means he should have allowed amendment and thus not Alhena Nov 2020 #25
That's not what they're arguing at this point StarfishSaver Nov 2020 #27
Depends what's in the Second Amended Complaint. I haven't looked at it. Alhena Nov 2020 #29
The second amended complaint essentially repleads the claims from the original complaint StarfishSaver Nov 2020 #35
Exactly. Dismissed with prejudice means it can't be amended. Probably why the judge didn't allow yellowcanine Nov 2020 #23
Prior to dismissing (in the same order), the court denied his request to amend the complaint. Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #37
They might actually "win" this appeal, but it's not much of a win if so Alhena Nov 2020 #15
Decisions as to amendments are at the judge's discretion StarfishSaver Nov 2020 #24
Yes, I think he most likely loses, but the 3rd circuit standard makes it so the issue will most Alhena Nov 2020 #28
Exactly - that's my point StarfishSaver Nov 2020 #33
What's the appellate court likely to do with the fact that Rudy signed the appeal alone.. Nevilledog Nov 2020 #47
They are delaying. Renew Deal Nov 2020 #31
They can try - but this case isn't going prevent Pennsylvania from certifying StarfishSaver Nov 2020 #38
They actually ask to decertify if it's already been certified soothsayer Nov 2020 #41
Alright, I looked at the proposed Second Amended Complaint on PACER ... Alhena Nov 2020 #36
Can you pull down the original complaint? StarfishSaver Nov 2020 #40
The original complaint was 85 pages, the proposed 2nd Amended Complaint is 112 pages, so there's Alhena Nov 2020 #43
There's not really anything new in it StarfishSaver Nov 2020 #45
I don't think they ultimately will have any success. captain queeg Nov 2020 #39
They can certainly consider that in assessing whether the trial judge abused his discretion StarfishSaver Nov 2020 #42
Trump Campaign Seeks Very Limited Emergency Remedy in Third Circuit Gothmog Nov 2020 #53
They're trying to get to SCOTUS, where they hope everything will be forgiven struggle4progress Nov 2020 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»🚨NEW: Trump campa...»Reply #49