Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

JoeOtterbein

(7,870 posts)
Wed Nov 25, 2020, 09:51 AM Nov 2020

It Wasn't Ideology That Sank House Democrats. It Was Bad Strategy. [View all]

Politico

Poor decisions from the national party left Democratic candidates in swing districts unable to hold their own.

By MITI SATHE and WILL LEVITT

11/25/2020 04:30 AM EST

Miti Sathe is the executive director of Square One and a former Obama White House appointee.

Will Levitt is a co-founder of Square One.

The results are still uncalled in several closely-contested House races—but that hasn’t stopped congressional Democrats from launching into “deep dive” mode, trading bitter accusations as they try to come to terms with their party’s unexpectedly poor performance in key battleground districts this year. The scale of the losses has come to many as a shock, and yet the intramural immolation is all too familiar: Progressives accuse moderates of having alienated the party’s base, while moderates blame progressives for having scared off potential crossover voters, independents and even some Democrats in tough swing districts with sloganeering around “socialism” and calls to “defund the police.”

For the past three and a half years, through our organization, Square One, we have been working exclusively and on the ground with Democratic candidates running in precisely those sorts of districts. We are with many of our endorsed candidates from day one, providing the connections, resources and support to launch, run and win their campaigns. And from our experience, we are sure that both arguments are wrong.

It wasn’t ideology that this year sank seeming Democratic shoo-ins like Gina Ortiz Jones, a first generation American and Air Force veteran who, when she first ran in 2018, came only 927 votes short of winning her longtime red south Texas border district. (We endorsed and supported her in 2018 and again in 2020.) Nor were too-progressive politics what sent highly regarded first-term members of Congress like New Mexico’s Xochitl Torres Small back home to traditionally Republican districts, or that consigned other high-performing freshman incumbents like Lauren Underwood of Illinois into painfully protracted ballot counts—the latter of whom we’ve endorsed and worked with for the past two election cycles as well.

It was weak strategy, based on bad polling information and poor decisions from the national party that left Democratic candidates in swing districts—and candidates of color in particular—unable to hold their own in the face of a massive, and massively underestimated, Republican voter surge. The fact is: If you’re going to win a campaign, you’ve got to campaign, which means getting in front of voters and meeting them where they are. And that was the one thing that Democrats running for Congress could not do this year, upon orders from the party’s campaign arm in Washington, DC.

snip


more at link
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It was the Pandemic and Democrats not wanting to risk people's health JI7 Nov 2020 #1
A tactical decision based in large part on the virus is hard for NoMoreRepugs Nov 2020 #2
I was thinkng the same thing. ananda Nov 2020 #20
Donald Trump was able to get a lot of voters to the polls. kentuck Nov 2020 #3
It was the fact the GOP turned out 11m more trumpers, My Pet Orangutan Nov 2020 #4
We SANK?. Great use of hyperbole Politico. If you are going to use terminology that isn't Ferrets are Cool Nov 2020 #5
We LOST House seats, DIDN'T take the Senate and lost in the State Legislatures brooklynite Nov 2020 #8
OK, look at it how you will. Ferrets are Cool Nov 2020 #9
BETTER BELIEVE IT! MrsCoffee Nov 2020 #6
The outcome was dictated by a number of factors and no single issue over another beachbumbob Nov 2020 #7
Good analysis dustyscamp Nov 2020 #10
Lulz! NurseJackie Nov 2020 #11
+100000 The base is not comprised of 'summer soldiers'. We showed up and we voted for Demsrule86 Nov 2020 #22
Yes indeed... NurseJackie Nov 2020 #25
Jackie that is the best comparison I have ever read. Demsrule86 Nov 2020 #27
Sooo... fuck the pandemic? Happy Hoosier Nov 2020 #12
Dems down ticket didn't run against Trump Johnny2X2X Nov 2020 #13
I can think of a number of races where the person ran against Trump and lost. Demsrule86 Nov 2020 #23
The Unlikely Voters BelieveCassandra Nov 2020 #14
Agreed. Plus... JoeOtterbein Nov 2020 #18
Most voters don't know who their congressperson is. gulliver Nov 2020 #15
Anyone can be a Monday morning quarterback. lpbk2713 Nov 2020 #16
It starts in college. The Republicans have been Phoenix61 Nov 2020 #17
Excellent point! JoeOtterbein Nov 2020 #19
This is article is wrong and meant to excuse the left from responsibility for this failure. Demsrule86 Nov 2020 #21
+1, They were even using AOC in ads in Southern California. R B Garr Nov 2020 #24
It is clear...and the idea that newbie house members have some ability to Demsrule86 Nov 2020 #28
Trump connected with socially alienated voters and got them to the polls Yavin4 Nov 2020 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It Wasn't Ideology That S...