Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)It Wasn't Ideology That Sank House Democrats. It Was Bad Strategy. [View all]
Politico
Poor decisions from the national party left Democratic candidates in swing districts unable to hold their own.
By MITI SATHE and WILL LEVITT
11/25/2020 04:30 AM EST
Miti Sathe is the executive director of Square One and a former Obama White House appointee.
Will Levitt is a co-founder of Square One.
The results are still uncalled in several closely-contested House racesbut that hasnt stopped congressional Democrats from launching into deep dive mode, trading bitter accusations as they try to come to terms with their partys unexpectedly poor performance in key battleground districts this year. The scale of the losses has come to many as a shock, and yet the intramural immolation is all too familiar: Progressives accuse moderates of having alienated the partys base, while moderates blame progressives for having scared off potential crossover voters, independents and even some Democrats in tough swing districts with sloganeering around socialism and calls to defund the police.
For the past three and a half years, through our organization, Square One, we have been working exclusively and on the ground with Democratic candidates running in precisely those sorts of districts. We are with many of our endorsed candidates from day one, providing the connections, resources and support to launch, run and win their campaigns. And from our experience, we are sure that both arguments are wrong.
It wasnt ideology that this year sank seeming Democratic shoo-ins like Gina Ortiz Jones, a first generation American and Air Force veteran who, when she first ran in 2018, came only 927 votes short of winning her longtime red south Texas border district. (We endorsed and supported her in 2018 and again in 2020.) Nor were too-progressive politics what sent highly regarded first-term members of Congress like New Mexicos Xochitl Torres Small back home to traditionally Republican districts, or that consigned other high-performing freshman incumbents like Lauren Underwood of Illinois into painfully protracted ballot countsthe latter of whom weve endorsed and worked with for the past two election cycles as well.
It was weak strategy, based on bad polling information and poor decisions from the national party that left Democratic candidates in swing districtsand candidates of color in particularunable to hold their own in the face of a massive, and massively underestimated, Republican voter surge. The fact is: If youre going to win a campaign, youve got to campaign, which means getting in front of voters and meeting them where they are. And that was the one thing that Democrats running for Congress could not do this year, upon orders from the partys campaign arm in Washington, DC.
snip
Poor decisions from the national party left Democratic candidates in swing districts unable to hold their own.
By MITI SATHE and WILL LEVITT
11/25/2020 04:30 AM EST
Miti Sathe is the executive director of Square One and a former Obama White House appointee.
Will Levitt is a co-founder of Square One.
The results are still uncalled in several closely-contested House racesbut that hasnt stopped congressional Democrats from launching into deep dive mode, trading bitter accusations as they try to come to terms with their partys unexpectedly poor performance in key battleground districts this year. The scale of the losses has come to many as a shock, and yet the intramural immolation is all too familiar: Progressives accuse moderates of having alienated the partys base, while moderates blame progressives for having scared off potential crossover voters, independents and even some Democrats in tough swing districts with sloganeering around socialism and calls to defund the police.
For the past three and a half years, through our organization, Square One, we have been working exclusively and on the ground with Democratic candidates running in precisely those sorts of districts. We are with many of our endorsed candidates from day one, providing the connections, resources and support to launch, run and win their campaigns. And from our experience, we are sure that both arguments are wrong.
It wasnt ideology that this year sank seeming Democratic shoo-ins like Gina Ortiz Jones, a first generation American and Air Force veteran who, when she first ran in 2018, came only 927 votes short of winning her longtime red south Texas border district. (We endorsed and supported her in 2018 and again in 2020.) Nor were too-progressive politics what sent highly regarded first-term members of Congress like New Mexicos Xochitl Torres Small back home to traditionally Republican districts, or that consigned other high-performing freshman incumbents like Lauren Underwood of Illinois into painfully protracted ballot countsthe latter of whom weve endorsed and worked with for the past two election cycles as well.
It was weak strategy, based on bad polling information and poor decisions from the national party that left Democratic candidates in swing districtsand candidates of color in particularunable to hold their own in the face of a massive, and massively underestimated, Republican voter surge. The fact is: If youre going to win a campaign, youve got to campaign, which means getting in front of voters and meeting them where they are. And that was the one thing that Democrats running for Congress could not do this year, upon orders from the partys campaign arm in Washington, DC.
snip
more at link
28 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It Wasn't Ideology That Sank House Democrats. It Was Bad Strategy. [View all]
JoeOtterbein
Nov 2020
OP
We SANK?. Great use of hyperbole Politico. If you are going to use terminology that isn't
Ferrets are Cool
Nov 2020
#5
We LOST House seats, DIDN'T take the Senate and lost in the State Legislatures
brooklynite
Nov 2020
#8
The outcome was dictated by a number of factors and no single issue over another
beachbumbob
Nov 2020
#7
+100000 The base is not comprised of 'summer soldiers'. We showed up and we voted for
Demsrule86
Nov 2020
#22
I can think of a number of races where the person ran against Trump and lost.
Demsrule86
Nov 2020
#23
This is article is wrong and meant to excuse the left from responsibility for this failure.
Demsrule86
Nov 2020
#21