Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(6,641 posts)

9. Correct Answer: "No Evidence" is a Legal Term Entitling Party to Summary Judgment

Wed Nov 25, 2020, 02:03 PM

Nov 2020

it means although a party might present "evidence" it is insufficient legally for relief

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why does the MSM continue to use the term "no evidence of wide-spread voter fraud"? [View all] PaulRevere08 Nov 2020 OP

Cause the M$M f***ing sucks ... mr_lebowski Nov 2020 #1

Yeah, just "no voter fraud" would do it. johnp3907 Nov 2020 #3

Lawyers. meadowlander Nov 2020 #4

because there were sporadic cases of voter fraud. drray23 Nov 2020 #5

Agree DrToast Nov 2020 #6

Exactly! SharonAnn Nov 2020 #7

Fair enough. I would think that .000000287 would be close enough to zero PaulRevere08 Nov 2020 #14

Exactly, there will always be people doing stupid crap. joshcryer Nov 2020 #16

No, I'm sure there is some voter fraud. KWR65 Nov 2020 #10

The "MSM" aren't dumb enough to make a binary, blanket statement like maxsolomon Nov 2020 #11

Landslide Lyndon Stallion Nov 2020 #13