Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stallion

(6,642 posts)
33. That's an Interesting Argument That Might Appeal to Religious Oriented Justices
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 12:23 PM
Nov 2020

hadn't thought of that

if marriage is a construct of religion (rather than the state) then a church founded on the principle of gay marriage would be entitled to 1st Amendment protection

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't think that will be overturned. MineralMan Nov 2020 #1
Not undo edhopper Nov 2020 #3
If any civil servant in the SS office can see Jesus tells me not to send that couple their check dsc Nov 2020 #7
+1, you can then say you see GIA and sent it anyway and not be fired according to the USSC. This ... uponit7771 Nov 2020 #26
I agree. I think marriage equality is settled law Buckeyeblue Nov 2020 #10
Alito and Thomas edhopper Nov 2020 #16
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has held repeatedly that the prohibition on ex post facto laws . . euphorb Nov 2020 #23
They wouldn't undo current marriages just allow discrimination against them which COULD make it uponit7771 Nov 2020 #24
I just saw that Indiana may be teeing up a case for them to at least weaken it. Proud Liberal Dem Nov 2020 #2
That is the link edhopper Nov 2020 #4
Loving v. Virginia... ProudMNDemocrat Nov 2020 #5
That was sarcasm edhopper Nov 2020 #6
Clarence Thomas also ruled against the VRA ProudMNDemocrat Nov 2020 #29
All you "but her email voters" must be so proud Demsrule86 Nov 2020 #8
The "she voted for AWR" voters too. NurseJackie Nov 2020 #13
As is the "She gave paid speeches on Wall Street" crowd StarfishSaver Nov 2020 #42
Paging the Bernie bro's and the Susan Sarandon crowd bottomofthehill Nov 2020 #14
My (very white, male) bro is one of those Ellen Forradalom Nov 2020 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Ellen Forradalom Nov 2020 #19
Good grief Cracklin Charlie Nov 2020 #9
How so? edhopper Nov 2020 #20
The Roberts court would not want any part of this AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #11
Roberts doesn't get to decide what cases the court hears SoonerPride Nov 2020 #12
The court should be brought into balance. barbtries Nov 2020 #15
It won't happen edhopper Nov 2020 #17
He might be persuaded barbtries Nov 2020 #22
Those issues edhopper Nov 2020 #34
it is not just Manchin, multiple other Dem Senators are against expansion too Celerity Nov 2020 #38
that's horrifying. barbtries Nov 2020 #45
It is basically the same for ending the filibuster, a few less perhaps Celerity Nov 2020 #46
Demonstrating, yet again, religion is amongst one of the most evil things wandering earth! n/t RKP5637 Nov 2020 #21
Yep, it really is the single most corrosive element in society Bettie Nov 2020 #27
I think Gorsuch and Roberts would side with the liberals Marius25 Nov 2020 #25
Not with the current edhopper Nov 2020 #35
Was before. As Sanders said at every appearance, the Hortensis Nov 2020 #28
With all the talk of civil war SlogginThroughIt Nov 2020 #30
The nation's geographically too mixed. But I often think of Hortensis Nov 2020 #37
Maybe, maybe not. intheflow Nov 2020 #31
That's an Interesting Argument That Might Appeal to Religious Oriented Justices Stallion Nov 2020 #33
Not even churches founded on the principle. intheflow Nov 2020 #43
That's a brilliantly clever approach. Mike 03 Nov 2020 #44
Congress shall make no law dickthegrouch Nov 2020 #32
And yet edhopper Nov 2020 #36
Gorsuch and Roberts? Orangepeel Nov 2020 #39
Gorsuch is a question mark edhopper Nov 2020 #40
yeah, but I don't think that will cost corporations a lot of money Orangepeel Nov 2020 #41
Do we really need to call it "gay marriage?" Piasladic Nov 2020 #47
I use "marriage equality", but in a situation like this, yes, I prefer, same-sex marriage. Behind the Aegis Nov 2020 #48
You make a good point edhopper Nov 2020 #49
I think we'll start to see an increasing split between what government considers a marriage and... Rstrstx Nov 2020 #50
Not do edhopper Nov 2020 #51
I'm a married gay man and am not worried at all. beaglelover Nov 2020 #52
They don't care about edhopper Nov 2020 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Same-sex marriage is now ...»Reply #33