Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

fishwax

(29,346 posts)
27. might that alienate undecideds who thought Obama won the debate or who thought it was a tie?
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 12:31 PM
Oct 2012

After all, according to the CBS poll, there were more in those two categories than in the "Romney won" column. Personally, I don't see why he should address the issue of who "won" the debate at all. (I would say that if he clearly won the debate as well.)

Rather, to the extent that he discusses the debate at all, he should focus on exploiting things Romney said that can help Obama in the polls. (Despite the apparent consensus among talking heads that Romney won, I think the Obama campaign will get more mileage out of the debate content in the long run.)

That's mostly the campaign's job, though, not Obama's. The candidate has no needs to join the debate over who won the debate. He should, instead, focus his energies on the debates that remain.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think he should say the truth gollygee Oct 2012 #1
Yes. Because it's the truth. jpljr77 Oct 2012 #2
On style... Yes. FBaggins Oct 2012 #3
No BeyondGeography Oct 2012 #4
How does that help him though? oberliner Oct 2012 #10
How does it not help him? BeyondGeography Oct 2012 #11
Could make him seem condescending oberliner Oct 2012 #13
He should say nothing and just continue being President. begin_within Oct 2012 #5
"He should say nothing and just continue being President" skeewee08 Oct 2012 #6
Obama is already the underdog going into the next debate. Selatius Oct 2012 #7
Talk about how boring it was... that's not just spin, it's also the truth! reformist2 Oct 2012 #8
Oh HELL no! KurtNYC Oct 2012 #9
How did Rmoney "win" if he said inaccurate things? treestar Oct 2012 #12
Beats me - but that seems to be the consensus oberliner Oct 2012 #14
Yes, he won the debate on performance but lost the war by lying and now we're going to expose him. WI_DEM Oct 2012 #15
This is why Dems frustrate me. Jennicut Oct 2012 #16
I don't think it's defeatest oberliner Oct 2012 #17
It would come off as weak Jennicut Oct 2012 #21
If it were a WWE wrestling match PA Democrat Oct 2012 #18
Nope. Blue Idaho Oct 2012 #19
Obama Supporters Concede Debate Defeat, Romney Heads to Virginia oberliner Oct 2012 #20
ABC - Seriously? Blue Idaho Oct 2012 #23
Seriously oberliner Oct 2012 #25
How many undecideds are left? Blue Idaho Oct 2012 #28
No! Only the broadcast is over. The debate is ongoing. Gidney N Cloyd Oct 2012 #22
No it would be silly. Ganja Ninja Oct 2012 #24
Obama Campaign: Romney Won Debate Because He Lied oberliner Oct 2012 #26
might that alienate undecideds who thought Obama won the debate or who thought it was a tie? fishwax Oct 2012 #27
No. We need to fight back against this notion that acting badly equates to winning. HuckleB Oct 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would it be smart for Oba...»Reply #27