Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

dixiechiken1

(2,113 posts)

4. Thank you for explaining so well.

Reply to Statistical (Original post)

Fri Dec 11, 2020, 05:45 PM

Dec 2020

I have been checking news feeds all day on this. Was starting to get frustrated and panicky. (Why should today be any different than the last 4 years, right?) I feel better now.

THANK YOU!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Understand that while it is likely to happen there may not be a ruling today due to Thomas/Alito [View all] Statistical Dec 2020 OP

Thanks for this well thought post-Statistical!! MillenialDemLXXXIII Dec 2020 #1

And Trump will praise them for being wise and courageous. Walleye Dec 2020 #2

And that dissent would be regarding the jurisdiction issue, and not the (de)merits. n/t malchickiwick Dec 2020 #3

Thank you for explaining so well. dixiechiken1 Dec 2020 #4

I will be extremely disappointed, gab13by13 Dec 2020 #5

They don't need to accept it to refute it. Statistical Dec 2020 #6

I was writing a reply when I left the room and hubs told me. LeftInTX Dec 2020 #9

I'm thinking Roberts wants a 9-0 ruling bluestarone Dec 2020 #7

Well, it came down today, but you called it, the two dissented Hortensis Dec 2020 #8

You were correct Dem2 Dec 2020 #10

Yeah those two. They are straight up dunces on this. Statistical Dec 2020 #11