General Discussion

gab13by13

(30,980 posts)

5. I will be extremely disappointed,

Fri Dec 11, 2020, 05:52 PM

Dec 2020

if the Supreme Court merely refuses to take the law suit. It is too important to our democracy for them to merely say, it is without merit
I agree with the Pa Ag. who wrote to the Supreme Court and demanded that it refute this law suit in no uncertain terms so that similar suits can never be filed again, that there will be a precedent.

If the Supreme Court merely refuses to hear the case we lose IMO, our democracy loses. The SC needs to clearly state that the law suit violates the Constitution and is seditious.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Understand that while it is likely to happen there may not be a ruling today due to Thomas/Alito [View all] Statistical Dec 2020 OP

Thanks for this well thought post-Statistical!! MillenialDemLXXXIII Dec 2020 #1

And Trump will praise them for being wise and courageous. Walleye Dec 2020 #2

And that dissent would be regarding the jurisdiction issue, and not the (de)merits. n/t malchickiwick Dec 2020 #3

Thank you for explaining so well. dixiechiken1 Dec 2020 #4

I will be extremely disappointed, gab13by13 Dec 2020 #5

They don't need to accept it to refute it. Statistical Dec 2020 #6

I was writing a reply when I left the room and hubs told me. LeftInTX Dec 2020 #9

I'm thinking Roberts wants a 9-0 ruling bluestarone Dec 2020 #7

Well, it came down today, but you called it, the two dissented Hortensis Dec 2020 #8

You were correct Dem2 Dec 2020 #10

Yeah those two. They are straight up dunces on this. Statistical Dec 2020 #11