Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
24. Oh, yes, to all. Except the "Charlie Brown" image of Democratic
Sat Dec 12, 2020, 02:35 PM
Dec 2020

leaders who never learned how vicious their colleagues could be, in spite of their taking almost literally every opportunity to insult, abuse, and inconvenience them. By the end of Clinton's administration, nothing was ever too mean, dishonorable, or small for them. This was a constantly hostile working environment.

Every time they were the majority party since the early '90s, their power expanded exponentially and they'd do everything they could to damage and tear down government institutions, to deliberately run the nation into debt with transfers of wealth to the wealthy, usually impede anything Democrats wanted to do because it was us, and to instill corruption; and of course their ability to deliver spiteful personal hurts and insults up close and personal to their Democratic colleagues also increased exponentially.

We're the ones who had no idea just how bad they'd become, and they just kept getting worse.

We all regret the lost opportunities in the beginning of Obama's administration, but I think he was very right to try to bring the nation together, given what was at stake. What they'd already become was a real danger to our nation, and his revolutionary election by a large majority of American voters MIGHT have been an inflection point for the nation, changing the trajectory of the right's decline into implacable corruption and enmity toward everything Democrat and liberal, and against democracy itself. We now know it accelerated it all, but he had to try. And he and the rest of his advisers didn't have our hindsight.

I'll do you one better William769 Dec 2020 #1
+1z Chin music Dec 2020 #2
That would be preferable but... kentuck Dec 2020 #3
Did they? William769 Dec 2020 #4
According to "them"... kentuck Dec 2020 #5
Exactly! sheshe2 Dec 2020 #6
For the umpteenth time, neither the Speaker nor the House has authority to refuse to seat them StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #11
We just love hearing you say it though. William769 Dec 2020 #12
Ha ha StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #13
You all know, Wellstone ruled Dec 2020 #7
From What I Can Tell, the Most We Can Hope For The Roux Comes First Dec 2020 #8
Nothing will be done to them and they know it. blueinredohio Dec 2020 #9
I agree StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #10
Put the bastards on trial for sedition. Public trial. Pepsidog Dec 2020 #14
The DOJ isn't going to put anyone on trial for breaking a law they didn't come close onenote Dec 2020 #25
I know DOJ isn't going to do anything even if there were elements of an offense and all trials Pepsidog Dec 2020 #29
All that can happen is censure. I'll take it. The rest can't be done w/o 2/3 votes. ancianita Dec 2020 #15
Yes. This posture of sedition will cost them Hortensis Dec 2020 #17
I'd love to believe that. But the only way for them to bear a cost is for Dems to really take ancianita Dec 2020 #18
Truth's strengths are that it's TRUTH and that it's proven with time. Hortensis Dec 2020 #19
I'd like to believe your 3rd P. Yet there are 71 million immune to long term Truth, no matter how ancianita Dec 2020 #20
:) Well, Democratic-owned radio won't happen. Apparently those Hortensis Dec 2020 #21
All of this makes perfect sense. Re major adjustments... ancianita Dec 2020 #22
Oh, yes, to all. Except the "Charlie Brown" image of Democratic Hortensis Dec 2020 #24
I hear you. ancianita Dec 2020 #27
:) Lucy's a darling compared to them. Nice people of course saw Hortensis Dec 2020 #28
Right, because she's just an image. ancianita Dec 2020 #30
:) No such thing. I'm unfortunately as dysfunctionally wired Hortensis Dec 2020 #32
Nope. No ironing. ancianita Dec 2020 #35
The ppl of their districts need to vote them out in 2022. Who would want a representative who iluvtennis Dec 2020 #16
I bet if you checked, the members of Congress that supported the Texas Supreme Court case onenote Dec 2020 #26
Yes, agree. It was just generic statement that if congress person supports taking away the votes iluvtennis Dec 2020 #33
Do you feel that way about Barbara Lee, Sheila Jackson Lee, Jamie Raskin onenote Dec 2020 #34
If they signed onto a lawsuit to throw out the votes of certain states, it would be wrong in my iluvtennis Dec 2020 #36
How is it different than asking Congress to throw out the results? onenote Dec 2020 #37
It's not going to happen. People are going to forget about this quickly. Kaleva Dec 2020 #23
Yes...they violated their oath...those that are not new. Demsrule86 Dec 2020 #31
100 years from now descendants will read about their traitorous relatives in history books. Vinca Dec 2020 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Every Congressman that to...»Reply #24