Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Every Congressman that took part in this seditious act should be censured on the floor of the House. [View all]onenote
(46,124 posts)34. Do you feel that way about Barbara Lee, Sheila Jackson Lee, Jamie Raskin
James McGovern, and Raúl Grijalva?
They are Democrats who tried (unsuccessfully) to raise objections to the counting of the electoral votes cast for Trump in certain states during the January 6, 2017 session tabulating those votes. In other words, they supported taking away the votes of the certified winner in those states.
For the record, there was absolutely nothing wrong with the Democrats attempting to raise objections -- although those objections were DOA since they weren't in writing and didn't have the support of at least one member of the Senate, as required by statute.
Making bad or ineffective arguments against counting the certified votes of a state doesn't (and shouldn't) deprive one of the right to serve in Congress.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Every Congressman that took part in this seditious act should be censured on the floor of the House. [View all]
kentuck
Dec 2020
OP
For the umpteenth time, neither the Speaker nor the House has authority to refuse to seat them
StarfishSaver
Dec 2020
#11
The DOJ isn't going to put anyone on trial for breaking a law they didn't come close
onenote
Dec 2020
#25
I know DOJ isn't going to do anything even if there were elements of an offense and all trials
Pepsidog
Dec 2020
#29
All that can happen is censure. I'll take it. The rest can't be done w/o 2/3 votes.
ancianita
Dec 2020
#15
I'd love to believe that. But the only way for them to bear a cost is for Dems to really take
ancianita
Dec 2020
#18
I'd like to believe your 3rd P. Yet there are 71 million immune to long term Truth, no matter how
ancianita
Dec 2020
#20
The ppl of their districts need to vote them out in 2022. Who would want a representative who
iluvtennis
Dec 2020
#16
I bet if you checked, the members of Congress that supported the Texas Supreme Court case
onenote
Dec 2020
#26
Yes, agree. It was just generic statement that if congress person supports taking away the votes
iluvtennis
Dec 2020
#33
If they signed onto a lawsuit to throw out the votes of certain states, it would be wrong in my
iluvtennis
Dec 2020
#36