Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Republicans plotting attempt to deny presidency to Biden on floor of the House if Trump gives the wo [View all]StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)21. Thanks for pointing this out
I've been referring to the objections the CBC lodged in 2001, totally forgetting they tried the same thing in 2017.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Republicans plotting attempt to deny presidency to Biden on floor of the House if Trump gives the wo [View all]
Wicked Blue
Dec 2020
OP
Yeah, well, it's another stunt by the Freedumb Caucus that's doomed to fail. We control the House
catbyte
Dec 2020
#4
Hey, no different than the shenanigans they're attempting. Two can play this game.
onetexan
Dec 2020
#16
She can't refuse to seat them on the basis they did something they're entitled to do by law
StarfishSaver
Dec 2020
#10
She hardly can threaten for utilizing a process that is expressly spelled out in the US Code
onenote
Dec 2020
#14
This is a procedure provided by law and that they're fully entitled to do
StarfishSaver
Dec 2020
#11
Those same procedure you don't like because some people try to exploit them
StarfishSaver
Dec 2020
#20
Do you have an example of when "we" engaged in the same process while knowing
usajumpedtheshark
Dec 2020
#30
On what basis should I accept that what you say is factual instead of opinion?
usajumpedtheshark
Dec 2020
#41
Thanks, but I aleady read it. I have always believed that it was up to the Supreme Court to
usajumpedtheshark
Dec 2020
#44
Apparently, you are unaware that the Supreme Court has already interpreted this
StarfishSaver
Dec 2020
#45
You are funny. Do you always view questioning of your statements as a sign of hostility?
usajumpedtheshark
Dec 2020
#47
The process for members of Congress to challenge electoral votes is unambiguously spelled out
onenote
Dec 2020
#46
Precisely, hence why PA's AG labelled it "seditious abuse of the judicial process"
onetexan
Dec 2020
#19
And it will again be said that there is no way that these representatives can be punished
usajumpedtheshark
Dec 2020
#9
There is no way for them to be "punished" for invoking a procedure that is enshrined in law.
onenote
Dec 2020
#17
If you look at the context of the discussion, we were talking about "punishing" them
StarfishSaver
Dec 2020
#36
I was not limiting punishment solely to what the legal system could impose.
usajumpedtheshark
Dec 2020
#29
If they challenge the election, It will be over in a short time.Both retire to their own caucuses...
Demsrule86
Dec 2020
#15
This..hse and senate both have to agree on the objection...will never happen
Thekaspervote
Dec 2020
#23
If the purpose of action is an attempt to overturn a free and fair election for the sole purpose of
Chainfire
Dec 2020
#37