Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why a University of Michigan professor voted 'No' on Pfizer's COVID vaccine [View all]ProfessorGAC
(75,624 posts)65. I'm With You
This is not a vaccine for an illness that affects a million people with a death rate of 1%. Or a flu that infects 50 million, but only kills 1 in 4,000
This thing is killing 2% and it's spreading rapidly with 15 million already infected.
The risk analysis that would typically be prudently followed is based upon a different level of risk than currently experienced.
And, I don't believe that all the researchers & developers were motivated by other than helping the public.
It wasn't rushed for any other reason than we are in a crisis of a proportion we have not experienced in over a century.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why a University of Michigan professor voted 'No' on Pfizer's COVID vaccine [View all]
LovingA2andMI
Dec 2020
OP
The FDA Poobah was saying today that anyone allergic to any of the components of the vaccine should
cwydro
Dec 2020
#1
That would be... "polyethylene glycol" for those who aren't good with initials.
NurseJackie
Dec 2020
#34
So she doesn't think the vaccine is "safe and effective" but wants the vaccine released anyway?
mathematic
Dec 2020
#2
I re-read the part you bolded: Dr. Fuller says it would be better to release the vaccine gradually
mathematic
Dec 2020
#12
Considering we don't have enough of the vaccine for everyone we are releasing it gradually.
LisaL
Dec 2020
#21
Well they ducked losing to the Buckeyes so she still wanted a big loss for the Big Blue
underpants
Dec 2020
#3
I realize that. My point is, how many people will die during those two months and how many get
LisaL
Dec 2020
#17
Great. There are plenty of other folks that look at the risk/benefit analysis and
AllyCat
Dec 2020
#10
I heard estimates that this particular treatment that rudi / trump / etc. costs upwards of $100-$200
SWBTATTReg
Dec 2020
#27
Because Trump's admin is so incompetent, it will be released relatively gradually in the US, rather
tblue37
Dec 2020
#13
What is the status of the five states that said they needed to have their own independent approval ?
MichMan
Dec 2020
#26
K&R, there is ONLY 2 MONTHS OF SAFETY STUDY for the current vaccines. I 100% agree with this
uponit7771
Dec 2020
#29
My understanding is we're supposed to get the data for the sample group this week
uponit7771
Dec 2020
#46
A report I heard on the news that it had less side effects during the clinical trial.
roamer65
Dec 2020
#78
+1, honestly I don't trust Trump. I can imagine him doing something stupid to make people
uponit7771
Dec 2020
#77