Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)

4. So some election worker giving an observer a dirty look doesn't merit overturning an election?

Reply to Nevilledog (Original post)

Sat Dec 26, 2020, 06:58 PM

Dec 2020

Huh. I would have thought such a blatant display of something would be specifically addressed in the Constitution. Is it Trump's fault he doesn't have anything better than this to bring to a lawsuit? Which should be enough to overturn the election results.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Thread debunking "the judges didn't look at evidence" nonsense about election lawsuits [View all] Nevilledog Dec 2020 OP

I wasn't aware that they had presented any evidence. Arkansas Granny Dec 2020 #1

I Read The Rolled Version ProfessorGAC Dec 2020 #2

Kind of hard to look at nonexistent evidence. yellowcanine Dec 2020 #3

So some election worker giving an observer a dirty look doesn't merit overturning an election? gratuitous Dec 2020 #4

And it WAS in an "after david" Nevilledog Dec 2020 #5