Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)

3. Your are so spot on.

Reply to LymphocyteLover (Original post)

Sat Dec 26, 2020, 11:22 PM

Dec 2020

That is the number one reason. He knows his Crime Syndicate would have to post all of the Sources as well as the Names associated with his funding sources.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did Trump veto the NDAA because of its anti-money laundering provision? [View all] LymphocyteLover Dec 2020 OP

Yes, I believe that was the prime reason, else he'd have to disclose the funders of his shell comps. TheBlackAdder Dec 2020 #1

makes sense! LymphocyteLover Dec 2020 #2

Your are so spot on. Wellstone ruled Dec 2020 #3

it makes sense... what's funny/annoying is how he keeps coming up with different excuses LymphocyteLover Dec 2020 #4

Typical Mob Boss Wellstone ruled Dec 2020 #10

As always, follow the money... Wounded Bear Dec 2020 #5

True-- that usually works!! LymphocyteLover Dec 2020 #6

It's long past time we cleaned up the dark money paths through shell companies world wide. Wounded Bear Dec 2020 #9

I had heard someone say that the bill was veto proof. What happened? Autumn Dec 2020 #7

That just means that there seems to be enough votes to overturn it... Wounded Bear Dec 2020 #8