General Discussion

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)

51. lol lol. really, was what it looked like. nt

Reply to dawg (Reply #49)

Tue Jan 10, 2012, 01:40 PM

Jan 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

60 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is there a new sexual repression occurring [View all] Burgman Jan 2012 OP

Not really. No. People are going to have different opinions. chrisa Jan 2012 #1

Hmm... ananda Jan 2012 #2

Exactly. redqueen Jan 2012 #36

We'll never know because we can't figure out what you're talking about. n/t Little Star Jan 2012 #3

I think we are be repressed from knowing. It is a good topic but I would like to know more. Hope southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #4

sexuality has always been taboo in this country. Burgman Jan 2012 #7

. muriel_volestrangler Jan 2012 #17

Not really taboo on DU2... Little Star Jan 2012 #18

But that was a LIBERAL vibrator! emulatorloo Jan 2012 #38

You mean that wasn't a purple garden spade?!?!?! dawg Jan 2012 #49

lol lol. really, was what it looked like. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #51

Not really. Sex is discussed in many venues. MineralMan Jan 2012 #19

lmfao. ya, right. that would be why we never see the sexualization of women fuckin seabeyond Jan 2012 #21

Your right. southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #35

Oh, stop. lapislzi Jan 2012 #48

Apparently, he has his briefs in a bunch over another thread. N/t demmiblue Jan 2012 #9

Imagine--being so repressed you aren't allowed to tell female posters 'B$^% Me!' at will. nt msanthrope Jan 2012 #16

says something about his need to start these threads to dismiss women. point about men with this seabeyond Jan 2012 #23

Yes. redqueen Jan 2012 #39

Repression is an unconscious shadow of the observer. denem Jan 2012 #5

I think so. Pacafishmate Jan 2012 #6

There's not exactly any repression in the commercial profits raked in by sex. denem Jan 2012 #8

Yes, but for a different reason. no_hypocrisy Jan 2012 #10

The push is for states rights. That way, red states can stop abortion and contraceptives WingDinger Jan 2012 #11

I believe it's called 'Simple Courtesy and Civility" LanternWaste Jan 2012 #12

^^^^ post 12 nailed (hahahahaha) it ^^^^ n/t Scout Jan 2012 #43

OK, where is the thread that started this? I need to get... TreasonousBastard Jan 2012 #13

yes. SOME men are so busy with their porn, they cant get out of the house to find a woman. seabeyond Jan 2012 #14

After telling a female DUer to 'B!$# Me' in another thread, you think you're being repressed? msanthrope Jan 2012 #15

It's rather odd, isn't it? redqueen Jan 2012 #40

I in no way feel suppressed but the irony lies in that the post you reference Burgman Jan 2012 #53

Yes. Your post violated community standards. msanthrope Jan 2012 #59

So we can't type out the word "Blow" anymore? Goblinmonger Jan 2012 #55

You can do what you want. But I suggest not telling other posters to msanthrope Jan 2012 #58

I don't think I ever advocated that. Goblinmonger Jan 2012 #60

What happened to all that lovey-dovey... RevStPatrick Jan 2012 #20

No meds here. Burgman Jan 2012 #28

You see, now that's a reasonable reply! RevStPatrick Jan 2012 #31

That was a very rhetorical reply Burgman Jan 2012 #54

A jury deciding that you can't tell another poster to "bl0w you" justiceischeap Jan 2012 #22

male privilege. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #25

+10^100 redqueen Jan 2012 #41

Applause. lapislzi Jan 2012 #46

Poor Burgman thinks he is being repressed because he cannot PA Democrat Jan 2012 #24

"blow me" in the vernacular is very much the same as "fuck off" Burgman Jan 2012 #56

you started this thread before you told a member to blow you maddezmom Jan 2012 #26

Yes graywarrior Jan 2012 #27

Yes, because misogyny is obviously FREEDUMB!!! Odin2005 Jan 2012 #29

Every juror voted that this thread is OK? What horsehit. Odin2005 Jan 2012 #30

This thread is a distraction from the repression happening woo me with science Jan 2012 #32

is that repression happening in my pants right now? JCMach1 Jan 2012 #33

You REALLY need to clarify your terms. lapislzi Jan 2012 #34

No not really. Sheepshank Jan 2012 #37

No, there is not. n/t Scout Jan 2012 #42

Quite the opposite... Spazito Jan 2012 #44

Not as such but there is a trend among some Democrats to adopt the moralizing TheKentuckian Jan 2012 #45

except, it has nothing to do with moralizing. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #47

Help! Help! I'm being repressed! dawg Jan 2012 #50

There can be a puritanical authoritarianism of the secular left just as easily as there can be a Douglas Carpenter Jan 2012 #52

Sez it all. Burgman Jan 2012 #57