Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)A Cheerleader's Vulgar Message Prompts a First Amendment Showdown [View all]
Source: The New York Times - Adam Liptak Mon, December 28, 2020, 7:10 AM CSTWASHINGTON It was a Saturday in the spring of 2017, and a ninth grade student in Pennsylvania was having a bad day. She had just learned that she had failed to make the varsity cheerleading squad and would remain on junior varsity.
The student expressed her frustration on social media, sending a message on Snapchat to about 250 friends. The message included an image of the student and a friend with their middle fingers raised, along with text expressing a similar sentiment. Using a curse word four times, the student expressed her dissatisfaction with school, softball, cheer and everything.
Though Snapchat messages are ephemeral by design, another student took a screenshot of this one and showed it to her mother, a coach. The school suspended the student from cheerleading for a year, saying the punishment was needed to avoid chaos and maintain a teamlike environment.
The student sued the school district, winning a sweeping victory in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in Philadelphia. The court said the First Amendment did not allow public schools to punish students for speech outside school grounds....CONTINUED.....
Link: https://www.yahoo.com/news/cheerleaders-vulgar-message-prompts-first-131037750.html
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I believe in free speech, as well as the freedom to face the consequences of that speech. I am concerned that the Supreme Court will uphold this ruling, and will only promote the decline of our already crude deteriorating public conversation (especially after what we have seen over the last four years).
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I also believe in free speech, as well as facing its consequences, but I hope
The Velveteen Ocelot
Dec 2020
#1
What about race hatred speech, or religious intolerant speech? I believe that the Court
Blue_true
Dec 2020
#53
I realize it's a two edge sword, with a thousand different situations ln different contexts.
IsItJustMe
Dec 2020
#4
with the prevalence of social media "outside of school" takes on a new meaning.
Blue_true
Dec 2020
#54
I meant two different situations. Racist speech off of school grounds I would want regulated.
Beakybird
Dec 2020
#14
The vast majority of employers can fire you for almost any reason they can think of.
IsItJustMe
Dec 2020
#20
Speech is free. Consequences are paid in full. Over-reactions are ridiculous.
Moostache
Dec 2020
#16
Wasn't there also a one about a 14 year old making a sexually suggestive nomination for student
meadowlander
Dec 2020
#37
Do you really want to go down the road of school regulating every minute of a student's life?
NutmegYankee
Dec 2020
#42
I don't have a view one way or the other. I'm just trying to identify the relevant issue.
meadowlander
Dec 2020
#45
One of the great things Obama did was talk about "teachable moments". It would be great to
jalan48
Dec 2020
#29
Flynt was put on trial in Hamilton Co. (Cincinnati) when I was in High School
maxsolomon
Dec 2020
#47
I have no problem with speech having consequences. So long as the government isn't the one
onenote
Dec 2020
#63
I've always approached this subject that being on a team was a privilege and not a right.
Hassin Bin Sober
Dec 2020
#67