Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JHB

(38,200 posts)
11. Then it might be a smart idea to make it a little more mandatory than merely "preserving options"...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:00 PM
Oct 2012

...so that it actually functions in the way that it was advertised, and isn't simply a giveaway to those who already have plenty of resources to create jobs but don't see it as in their interest to do so.

An employee is overhead on their books. The demand generated by that employee's spending does not directly contribute to their bottom line, unless he's buying from a company store. That math says they should not add to their overhead, and should just take the tax benefit anyway.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»to business people: what ...»Reply #11