Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

BGBD

(3,282 posts)
12. This board is really bad at
Wed Dec 30, 2020, 07:10 PM
Dec 2020

Being overly alarming. There are many problems with this report.

1: the shot isn't effective immediately, it takes weeks to work.
2: it is a 2 shot regime.
3: 95% effectiveness means it will stop 19/20 infections, not all of them.
4: is the nurse seriously ill? The shot has proven to decrease severity in those that do get infected.
5: when was the nurse infected? A week+ lag time between infection and a positive test would not be abnormal.
6: this is highly anecdotal.

Lets just start looking at things a bit more scientifically and not as alarmists.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»California nurse tests po...»Reply #12