Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(4,602 posts)

7. No none of those would work

Mon Jan 4, 2021, 11:58 AM

Jan 2021

Not one of them could stand up to the US military. And none of them would even try.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does Trump really need the military in order to declare martial law? [View all] kentuck Jan 2021 OP

People don't know what "martial" law is. onenote Jan 2021 #1

+100 MineralMan Jan 2021 #3

Thank you Cirque du So-What Jan 2021 #8

The folks wanting it also seem to not get their guns would be take away obamanut2012 Jan 2021 #9

shithole is betting on a "civil war" . . Iliyah Jan 2021 #2

Martial law Turin_C3PO Jan 2021 #4

Martial Law Is Specifically about Using the Military MineralMan Jan 2021 #5

No none of those would work Loki Liesmith Jan 2021 #7

Martial law explicitly means the military enforces the law. Fiendish Thingy Jan 2021 #10

Declaring martial law would change nothing Thekaspervote Jan 2021 #11