Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NathanTheGreat

(78 posts)
46. Why we can't just enforce free and open commercials
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 04:14 PM
Jan 2012

Have you ever seen how many people run for a single office sometimes? Yeah, this makes sense when there's just 2 or 3 people running, but often the primaries have 30 or more candidates, and the general election often has 8-10 people.

Take the number of candidates running for election in the viewing range of a single TV station, and you're probably talking about several thousand people even in small markets, even more in large markets.

Do you seriously think it's possible to establish rules that provide equal time for every one of these thousands of people on every channel...and i'll also throw the monkey wrench of national network commercials...they have to give equal time to every person who's running for president? Have you ever seen how many people run for president?

There is no better way to remove the overwealming influence of money from elections...or at least I've never seen one.

And yes...this is going to happen. I get nothing but support when I talk to people uninvolved and uninterested in politics...and those people are the majority in this country.

This is going to happen...this is the only way.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R !!! RKP5637 Jan 2012 #1
K&R ClassWarrior Jan 2012 #2
Ahhh...too many acronyms NathanTheGreat Jan 2012 #3
can do K@r for ya backwoodsbob Jan 2012 #5
NGU = Never Give Up nt pinboy3niner Jan 2012 #7
Ah ha NathanTheGreat Jan 2012 #14
Make them X-rated BeFree Jan 2012 #4
You would need a constitutional amendment. Nye Bevan Jan 2012 #6
Bingo! pinboy3niner Jan 2012 #9
Technically NathanTheGreat Jan 2012 #10
but they have to have some compelling, competing reason unblock Jan 2012 #13
I'd go farther NathanTheGreat Jan 2012 #20
+1 Scuba Jan 2012 #35
but the problem is not sufficient free speech, rather the lack of it unblock Jan 2012 #41
Great idea> Survivoreesta Jan 2012 #8
why not repeal then entire bill of rights while you're at it? unblock Jan 2012 #11
+1 cthulu2016 Jan 2012 #21
I don't think you're denying free speech at all NathanTheGreat Jan 2012 #22
"Broadcasting is not speech" cthulu2016 Jan 2012 #26
The same way NathanTheGreat Jan 2012 #32
i can't believe this is even a topic for debate. do you SERIOUSLY think our founders wanted that? unblock Jan 2012 #42
Do you think our founders imagined? NathanTheGreat Jan 2012 #43
wow! twice in one hour you position yourself as adult/grownup and dismiss what i have to say. unblock Jan 2012 #44
A little irony there, don't you think? NathanTheGreat Jan 2012 #45
Just the opposite for me blogslut Jan 2012 #12
What I don't like is the anonymity factor. lpbk2713 Jan 2012 #15
Either way, manage public airwaves for the benefit of the public. dougolat Jan 2012 #16
"Public Airwaves" simply not what they were Spike89 Jan 2012 #17
You seem to have forgotten about the First Amendment. GreenStormCloud Jan 2012 #18
How is this throwing away? NathanTheGreat Jan 2012 #23
+1 ClassWarrior Jan 2012 #24
By your standard the government can censor newspapers. GreenStormCloud Jan 2012 #36
Political ads need to be regulated. RC Jan 2012 #19
I thought the same NathanTheGreat Jan 2012 #29
If cigarette ads can be banned from TV treestar Jan 2012 #25
Politics is not considered commerce. cthulu2016 Jan 2012 #28
I'm not entirely sure NathanTheGreat Jan 2012 #31
Even so - while we could say Congress can regulate interstate commerce treestar Jan 2012 #33
The cigarette companies didn't fight it. GreenStormCloud Jan 2012 #38
That would be true treestar Jan 2012 #39
The First Amendment is always frustrating to those who wish to limit free speech. tritsofme Jan 2012 #27
Here's a way to get money out of political campaigns Shankapotomus Jan 2012 #30
No. What a god awful and stupidly draconian idea. Stand and Fight Jan 2012 #34
let's eliminate 'citizens united' spanone Jan 2012 #37
First off, that would be unconstitutional. MineralMan Jan 2012 #40
Why we can't just enforce free and open commercials NathanTheGreat Jan 2012 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Please Support Banning Po...»Reply #46