Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

duforsure

(11,885 posts)

5. I would think the Gov. Could then be charged by the court,

Reply to Takket (Original post)

Thu Jan 14, 2021, 09:13 AM

Jan 2021

If he prevents a court decision from being carried out, but the extradition can be contested to delay it. Once that's decided I think a Gov. Is at risk legally if he prevents it, but legal minds surely know for sure.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How does extradition take place between states? [View all] Takket Jan 2021 OP

U S Marshalls go and get them. pwb Jan 2021 #1

For state charges? NT mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2021 #3

I have never heard of a state truly fighting extradiction LeftInTX Jan 2021 #2

Constitution, Article IV, Section 2, Clause ii struggle4progress Jan 2021 #4

Ty! SheltieLover Jan 2021 #9

I would think the Gov. Could then be charged by the court, duforsure Jan 2021 #5

18 USC 3182 struggle4progress Jan 2021 #6

Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause ii struggle4progress Jan 2021 #7

My summary (as a non-lawyer): The Constitution and Federal Statute require extradition, struggle4progress Jan 2021 #8

Excellent summary. So it looks like there is really no stopping extradition. Takket Jan 2021 #10

Didn't Rittenhouse/his lawyers fight extradition DeminPennswoods Jan 2021 #11

I think he contested legality on some technical issue struggle4progress Jan 2021 #13

Defense lawyers fight it all the time but rarely win JT45242 Jan 2021 #12