Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

James48

(5,139 posts)
34. Yes-
Mon Oct 8, 2012, 07:47 PM
Oct 2012

It appears they polled mainly white conservative men over age 50 from the south.

That's the biggest single group in their data. I would think that Romney would have scored better among white conservative men over age 50 from the south.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Does that mean we should start "unskewing" polls? regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #1
No. But I Do Think, As We Discussed, When The Poll Was Taken, Is Of Great Consequence DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #3
This is raw data. Don't think anything was skewed. berni_mccoy Oct 2012 #5
No, it means we should reject polls with bad methodology Bjorn Against Oct 2012 #22
I say pew to pew... movonne Oct 2012 #63
they also apparently did the vast majority of their polling immediately after the debates magical thyme Oct 2012 #2
I Really Don't Think That Qualifies As Unskewing DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #4
Some real demographics eh? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2012 #6
K&R patrice Oct 2012 #7
What the Heck, Pew! Cha Oct 2012 #8
In other words, an outlier. Panasonic Oct 2012 #9
The size of the sample doesn't matter after say 1,000 as long as your WCGreen Oct 2012 #35
Actually, if the sample is a good one, meaning properly weighted, SheilaT Oct 2012 #49
Yep, I took statistics a long time ago and was not a wiz kid when I took it--- Grammy23 Oct 2012 #66
WHY would they do that? patrice Oct 2012 #10
The Corporate-controlled MSM? They have skin in this game. CakeGrrl Oct 2012 #14
because they're owned, run, and staffed by right-wing Repukes? Doctor_J Oct 2012 #16
Yeah, I guess I need to look at Pew closer; I thought it was research . . . patrice Oct 2012 #17
How embarrassing. All polls should have this basic data prominently featured. reformist2 Oct 2012 #11
this is good news though PD Turk Oct 2012 #12
yep berni_mccoy Oct 2012 #13
Thanks! Berni! I shared it and will continue to do so daily for a while, a week maybe. patrice Oct 2012 #15
BUT if all they want to do is STEAL an election, then these PHONY polls are support of his "WIN" Tigress DEM Oct 2012 #60
I'm pretty sure that's the plan. FiveGoodMen Oct 2012 #64
Diane Sawyer announced this poll tonight... ABC News should know better! secondwind Oct 2012 #18
No, "Pew" is a name that should be trustworthy demwing Oct 2012 #30
Really? Pew had a good reputation for honest, nonpartisan research. alp227 Oct 2012 #38
We're saying the same thing demwing Oct 2012 #54
Here are the numbers... SidDithers Oct 2012 #19
Do I read that right? maxrandb Oct 2012 #20
Yes, and they polled the fewest number of people in the Northeast and the west Bjorn Against Oct 2012 #26
Yes- James48 Oct 2012 #34
By those numbers maxrandb Oct 2012 #39
1 out of every 20 polls is complete bunk. tritsofme Oct 2012 #21
Scientifically speaking, yes. caseymoz Oct 2012 #25
When 10% of your sample says they are liberal and voting Romney..... pkdu Oct 2012 #23
So this is why they attacked the BLS...... Wounded Bear Oct 2012 #24
Gallup switches to LV model tomorrow. SansACause Oct 2012 #27
Yet Chris Cillizza wrote a WaPo article of "takeaways" based on that poll alone. Sparkly Oct 2012 #28
Whether we agree or disagree with the data on each poll... cheriemedium59 Oct 2012 #29
I posted this in another thread... OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #31
The female voter switch seems absurd ejbr Oct 2012 #32
Same reason everything else changed. JoeyT Oct 2012 #51
Who the heck does a poll like that and say it's a "random" sample DavidL Oct 2012 #33
If you poll primarily in the South, you should not be surprised with conservative turnout. Sirveri Oct 2012 #56
Pew just proved themselves to be garbage. Dawson Leery Oct 2012 #36
The sample also has ALOT of people over 50. Ilsa Oct 2012 #37
Holy crap....Rachel's using the OLD poll numbers!!!.... OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #40
since people are going totally ape over all the polling swings, this thread is one of the most Gabi Hayes Oct 2012 #41
Push poll. Throw it out. n/t ClusterFreak Oct 2012 #42
A concerted effort to mislead the public. City Lights Oct 2012 #43
need to know anything more about Pew? read this: Gabi Hayes Oct 2012 #44
There's a bigger question here ProudToBeBlueInRhody Oct 2012 #45
If I were Pew and need to be in the news limelight JackN415 Oct 2012 #46
Never New that The South Was As Populous As West and Northeast Combined! TomCADem Oct 2012 #47
About regional specifics svip Oct 2012 #50
But from an electoral college point of view, heavy pro-Romney Southern support... TomCADem Oct 2012 #52
Very true svip Oct 2012 #53
That population you cite includes Maryland, Delaware, VA and DC berni_mccoy Oct 2012 #55
that's why they call it pew! trailmonkee Oct 2012 #48
Of course Tsiyu Oct 2012 #57
2 to 1 Tyson73 Oct 2012 #58
Based on census numbers the south is not over-represented. Vattel Oct 2012 #59
K&R Wednesdays Oct 2012 #61
So, 5-2 Repuke over Dem (and moderates in between) and the poll is still that close? Roland99 Oct 2012 #62
This poll supports the required M$M narrative. Blue Idaho Oct 2012 #65
This is perfect. It will just make the repugs that much more pissed off when it drops them down hard lindysalsagal Oct 2012 #67
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Heh, Pew Research Poll......»Reply #34