Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atticus

(15,124 posts)
9. But, doesn't that kind of childish cowardice make most people want to blow chunks? nt
Sat Jan 23, 2021, 02:53 PM
Jan 2021

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We might need it later? (nt) mr_lebowski Jan 2021 #1
Couldn't the same be said about machine guns? If we could trust everyone to be as patriotic, Atticus Jan 2021 #5
Our supply of dry powder MUST be protected, even at the cost of... ret5hd Jan 2021 #2
so we let the enemy use KatyMan Jan 2021 #25
i think there is no good argument. only tradition. bullimiami Jan 2021 #3
Far from. It's a double-edged sword on an uncontrollable handle. Hortensis Jan 2021 #15
Far from. It's a double-edged sword on an uncontrollable handle. Hortensis Jan 2021 #20
Republicans Might Win the Senate in the Future? TuskMoar Jan 2021 #4
For me, it's that as soon as Democrats do it, they have to be OnDoutside Jan 2021 #6
As Myron Cohen might have said: "Well! If you're going to throw LOGIC at me------!" Atticus Jan 2021 #7
I agree. Lose the filibuster and then go big. Dream Girl Jan 2021 #11
Yes, you'd only get one shot at it, so if they're not prepared for that OnDoutside Jan 2021 #17
I agree with this, and I'm not sure it can be done piecemeal.. Volaris Jan 2021 #16
It is all connected, yes, and I would be surprised if any of that OnDoutside Jan 2021 #19
Agree on all that. But just because were doing that first, doesnt mean ignoring Volaris Jan 2021 #21
100% agree. My only concern is that they choose wisely which to OnDoutside Jan 2021 #23
In all fairness to the counter-argument, I'm actually happy just now about Volaris Jan 2021 #26
Yes, I made that exact point at time Manchin came out and said OnDoutside Jan 2021 #27
OnDout, with a one-vote majority and a number of Democratic senators Hortensis Jan 2021 #22
100% agree, I was just saying that if they were to go that route, they OnDoutside Jan 2021 #24
It allows Senators to vote for what their constituents want but what their big donors oppose jalan48 Jan 2021 #8
But, doesn't that kind of childish cowardice make most people want to blow chunks? nt Atticus Jan 2021 #9
Yes, but it allows the Senator the opportunity to look like he/she is doing the right thing. jalan48 Jan 2021 #10
We need to get rid of it as soon as we can. It's a relic of slavery just like the EC. brush Jan 2021 #12
We agree. I just wondered if I had overlooked something that makes sense. So far, "No". nt Atticus Jan 2021 #13
The filibuster is a quick&dirty incomplete fix for an inherently defective electoral system. DetlefK Jan 2021 #14
The Senators would actually have to speak on the floor... joshcryer Jan 2021 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Serious question: What i...»Reply #9