Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

white_wolf

(6,257 posts)
Tue Oct 9, 2012, 01:05 PM Oct 2012

I learned something interesting about the "State's rights" arguments the Right loves. [View all]

In one of my classes we were discussing a Supreme Court case U.S. Term Limits V. Thorton. During the discussion my professor mentioned that in his decision Justice Stevens mentioned Justice Story's commentary on the 10th Amendment in which he argued that the 10th amendment "reserves" powers to the States that they held before the Constitution, but didn't refer to powers that arose after the Constitution was ratified. Powers that did not exist before the Constitution was ratified could not be reserved since they didn't exist.

He also mentioned that this is why Romney's line about the regulation of healthcare being something that should be left up to the State's is quote "hogwash."

Anyway, I just thought it was an interesting discussion considering the Right's obsession with State's Rights.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I learned something inter...