Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Some thoughts on Manchin's notion that he thinks some eligible citizens don't need the add'l $1,400 [View all]JT45242
(4,072 posts)13. What about married couples with different circumstances?
I am working from home. My take home pay has not been affected but some ancillary benefits have been removed. So, in the short term I am OK.
On teh other hand, my wife has had her income cut 75% by the pandemic and reduction in her job.
I make more than she does and we always budget off my salary and use her money for lifestyle (eating out, camp for kids, etc) and emergencies. So, we are still paying all our bills.
But -- multiple emergencies over the past year that her pay couldn't pay for... what then?
Makes sense to put a cap at say $200K for a family based on the living wage index. https://livingwage.mit.edu/
Multiple the $200K by living wage local/16.54 (for a family of four)
Adjusts for high or low costs of living in a fair way.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Some thoughts on Manchin's notion that he thinks some eligible citizens don't need the add'l $1,400 [View all]
Stinky The Clown
Jan 2021
OP
It would be hard to sort that out, a lot of wasted time. And though it may be a windfall,
LizBeth
Jan 2021
#1
Take into consideration the fact that the payments have two purposes:
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jan 2021
#2
Unfortunately it's not an either or situation. If you don't get the money doesn't mean another will
Walleye
Jan 2021
#9
How would we even work that? Sounds like the kind of complications a much needed bill
Walleye
Jan 2021
#6
I agree in that 300,000 income is to high to get stimulus. I would prefer to see more for the
Demsrule86
Jan 2021
#16
I just looked it up and West Virginia is the third poorest state per capita in the US.
panader0
Jan 2021
#29