Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(56,285 posts)
16. filtering the air may be good (to some extent, anyway) but circulating air might actually be bad
Fri Jan 29, 2021, 02:43 PM
Jan 2021

depending on the actual flow of air within the restaurant.

there was a study someone posted here a while ago that showed someone got infected from someone else in a restaurant 20+ feet away after only 5 minutes because the airflow carried the virus from an infected person to the person who caught it. i think that was just from ceiling fans, but any way a breeze is generated can be problematic or helpful.

ideally, i guess you would want airflow one way only (fresh air comes in one side of the building and out the other) and to position people so no one is downstream from anyone else. otherwise, still air might be better as the virus would tend to stay closer to the people already infected.

actually, if airflow could somehow be designed to go down -- fresh air from the ceiling and out through holes in the floor -- that would probably be best. haha, maybe that will catch on...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

when it gets much warmer hubby and i are gonna try one of those locally.. samnsara Jan 2021 #1
Of course... I can't even imagine a setting where I would "eat-in" for the indefinite future hlthe2b Jan 2021 #2
This. MissB Jan 2021 #4
right. lindysalsagal Jan 2021 #6
Yep. ShazzieB Jan 2021 #23
I wouldn't call them 100% safe. Laelth Jan 2021 #3
I would guess that the crowded dining room SoCalNative Jan 2021 #17
No. They are sealed off, outside. No ventilation. we can do it Jan 2021 #18
If they're well ventilated, cleaned after each use and scheduled with a down time dem4decades Jan 2021 #5
hell, where I live d_r Jan 2021 #7
Same here exboyfil Jan 2021 #10
Laurie Garrett hates them... brooklynite Jan 2021 #8
In my state, the tents have to be open on two sides RainCaster Jan 2021 #9
I see some like that, many completely closed --south sound. Pobeka Jan 2021 #13
In many ways the sealed tents can be worse RAB910 Jan 2021 #11
filtering the air may be good (to some extent, anyway) but circulating air might actually be bad unblock Jan 2021 #16
You're Actually On To Something ProfessorGAC Jan 2021 #24
There might be a marginal difference in air exchanges per hour Warpy Jan 2021 #12
You are not the only one Mattgoetznolovefromm Jan 2021 #14
There is little difference, but the die was cast when churches were exempted from the rules. PSPS Jan 2021 #15
the only unmasked people are the people you live with? Orangepeel Jan 2021 #19
Actually RobinA Jan 2021 #21
Like Us ProfessorGAC Jan 2021 #25
No, I Had This Same RobinA Jan 2021 #20
I'm with you. gldstwmn Jan 2021 #22
exactly! no difference bc it is about ventilation and it is the same. That would be a hard pass Vivienne235729 Jan 2021 #26
I've Seen One That Made Sense ProfessorGAC Jan 2021 #27
I miss dining out so much! redwitch Jan 2021 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Am I the only one who see...»Reply #16