Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Vote-by-mail spurred controversy, fraud charges and maybe the Capitol riot -- now it may become [View all]BumRushDaShow
(173,794 posts)41. There is some precedent including HAVA & "Motor Voter"
Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA)
H.R.2 - National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (a/k/a "Motor Voter Law" )
How the federal government implements voter laws at the national level is that such legislation would be effective for "federal elections" and what a state does for their state/county/municipal elections is up to them (e.g., special elections, primaries, etc). Usually the key piece for this would also mean the federal government would provide funding to carry it out (vs being what is often dubbed an "unfunded mandate" ).
The 62 ridiculous lawsuits that got thrown out were mostly due to the plaintiffs yelling about "fraud" but unable to show evidence of it, so they switched it up, literally mid-case, and then started arguing that a state "wasn't following their state law/Constitution", and the state courts responding with rolled eyes while the federal courts threw it back saying that the plaintiffs needed to deal with their "problem" in their state courts.
If the federal government wasn't "allowed" to implement election law at the federal level, then the Voting Rights Act of 1965 wouldn't have come about (although the courts have chipped away at it recently by throwing out Sections 4 & 5 dealing with "pre-clearance" for a specific set of states, where the argument was that the list was "outdated" ).
In the aftermath of the 2000 election and its many logistical issues, congress passed a bipartisan measure, the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA), in order to reform many facets of the voting process and increase voter education and turnout. Its goals include the replacement of voting machines, voter registration reform, better access to voting for the disabled and poll worker training. Congress set a date by which each goal must be completed, and provided federal funds to help with the process as long as they implement a plan and allocate a small amount of state funds to the effort. In addition, HAVA has successfully created the Election Assistance Commission in order to better facilitate federal elections.
Election Improvements
HAVA provides funds in order for states to replace outdated voting machines, create a system of provisional balloting, create a computerized voter registration system, train poll workers and change election day procedures. Provisional balloting allows a person who's name does not appear on the voter roll to cast a ballot which will be reviewed and checked later on. New election day procedures improve access for the disabled and require that a new voter who registered by mail show identification the first time that they vote.
In addition, as a result of HAVA, a new federal voter registration form was created in order to make it easier for a new voters to register. In addition, if someone fills out a provisional ballot, and it is rejected as a ballot for the current election, it will serve as a voter registration form for the next election. New voting equipment is required to give the voter a "second chance" meaning that if there is a possible mistake on the ballot, they must be notified about it before leaving the polling place.
HAVA also calls for more voter education, a "Voters Bill of Rights" to be posted in all polling places, election day registration and the ability for anyone to request an absentee ballot for any reason. Although many of the goals were set to be completed before the 2004 elections, the ultimate goals of HAVA are set to be completed before the 2006 elections.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/hava
Election Improvements
HAVA provides funds in order for states to replace outdated voting machines, create a system of provisional balloting, create a computerized voter registration system, train poll workers and change election day procedures. Provisional balloting allows a person who's name does not appear on the voter roll to cast a ballot which will be reviewed and checked later on. New election day procedures improve access for the disabled and require that a new voter who registered by mail show identification the first time that they vote.
In addition, as a result of HAVA, a new federal voter registration form was created in order to make it easier for a new voters to register. In addition, if someone fills out a provisional ballot, and it is rejected as a ballot for the current election, it will serve as a voter registration form for the next election. New voting equipment is required to give the voter a "second chance" meaning that if there is a possible mistake on the ballot, they must be notified about it before leaving the polling place.
HAVA also calls for more voter education, a "Voters Bill of Rights" to be posted in all polling places, election day registration and the ability for anyone to request an absentee ballot for any reason. Although many of the goals were set to be completed before the 2004 elections, the ultimate goals of HAVA are set to be completed before the 2006 elections.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/hava
H.R.2 - National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (a/k/a "Motor Voter Law" )
Conference report filed in House (04/28/1993)
National Voter Registration Act of 1993 - Requires each State to establish Federal election voter registration procedures by: (1) application made simultaneously with a driver's license application; (2) mail; and (3) application in person at a designated Federal, State, or nongovernmental office, or at the applicant's residential registration site in accordance with State law.
Declares that this Act does not apply to any State that has no voter registration requirement with respect to elections for Federal office and/or in which voters may register at the polling place at the time of a general election for Federal office.
(Sec. 5) Declares that each State motor vehicle license application (or renewal application) shall simultaneously serve as a voter registration application with respect to Federal elections, unless the applicant fails to sign the voter registration application. Sets forth provisions regarding: (1) forms and procedures; and (2) transmittal deadlines.
(Sec. 6) Requires each State to use the mail voter registration application form prescribed by the Federal Election Commission (Commission). Authorizes a State to develop its own form provided it meets the requirements of this Act.
Authorizes a State to require first-time voters to vote in person, with exceptions for overseas and handicapped or elderly persons.
Authorizes the removal of a voter application in the case of an undelivered (returned) notice of an application made by mail.
More: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/2
National Voter Registration Act of 1993 - Requires each State to establish Federal election voter registration procedures by: (1) application made simultaneously with a driver's license application; (2) mail; and (3) application in person at a designated Federal, State, or nongovernmental office, or at the applicant's residential registration site in accordance with State law.
Declares that this Act does not apply to any State that has no voter registration requirement with respect to elections for Federal office and/or in which voters may register at the polling place at the time of a general election for Federal office.
(Sec. 5) Declares that each State motor vehicle license application (or renewal application) shall simultaneously serve as a voter registration application with respect to Federal elections, unless the applicant fails to sign the voter registration application. Sets forth provisions regarding: (1) forms and procedures; and (2) transmittal deadlines.
(Sec. 6) Requires each State to use the mail voter registration application form prescribed by the Federal Election Commission (Commission). Authorizes a State to develop its own form provided it meets the requirements of this Act.
Authorizes a State to require first-time voters to vote in person, with exceptions for overseas and handicapped or elderly persons.
Authorizes the removal of a voter application in the case of an undelivered (returned) notice of an application made by mail.
More: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/2
How the federal government implements voter laws at the national level is that such legislation would be effective for "federal elections" and what a state does for their state/county/municipal elections is up to them (e.g., special elections, primaries, etc). Usually the key piece for this would also mean the federal government would provide funding to carry it out (vs being what is often dubbed an "unfunded mandate" ).
The 62 ridiculous lawsuits that got thrown out were mostly due to the plaintiffs yelling about "fraud" but unable to show evidence of it, so they switched it up, literally mid-case, and then started arguing that a state "wasn't following their state law/Constitution", and the state courts responding with rolled eyes while the federal courts threw it back saying that the plaintiffs needed to deal with their "problem" in their state courts.
If the federal government wasn't "allowed" to implement election law at the federal level, then the Voting Rights Act of 1965 wouldn't have come about (although the courts have chipped away at it recently by throwing out Sections 4 & 5 dealing with "pre-clearance" for a specific set of states, where the argument was that the list was "outdated" ).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Vote-by-mail spurred controversy, fraud charges and maybe the Capitol riot -- now it may become [View all]
Roisin Ni Fiachra
Jan 2021
OP
THIS BILL IS ***THE MOST IMPORTANT BILL !!!*** Cause if we can not vote we can not win !!!
uponit7771
Jan 2021
#1
Good! We would have passed one before had the electorate given us the power. nt
Hortensis
Jan 2021
#2
+1, The state I am in doesn't have no excuse mail in voting or early voting. This would change ...
uponit7771
Jan 2021
#5
Raw Story Headline is a bit misleading. Vote by Mail did NOT spur controversy, it was DT and the GOP
msfiddlestix
Jan 2021
#4
+1, I can get 2 - 3 extra family members to vote if they can vote by mail and not have to stand in
uponit7771
Jan 2021
#7
Hmmmm, seems like we can make it against the law to draw lines based on political slants for every
uponit7771
Jan 2021
#23
Happy to read this and crossing my fingers it gets passed. Anyone (...talking to you rethugs...)
iluvtennis
Jan 2021
#11
+1, if we don't get rid of it then we lose in 2022 seeing the kGOP is throwing up EVERY voter ...
uponit7771
Jan 2021
#15
It's important, but it's the postmarking that a ballot box cannot do, unless a barcode reader
ancianita
Jan 2021
#14
+1, if people thought 1/6 was crazy wait till dems start pushing VBM laws they'll literally blow up
uponit7771
Jan 2021
#18
So true. Which is why Dems have to get legislation that criminally convicts tamperers, imo.
ancianita
Jan 2021
#22
But with much harsher penalties than the current voter fraud slap-on-the-wrist ones.
ancianita
Jan 2021
#28
Put the cameras on the web -- many, many eyeballs and the public has a right to watch.
Hermit-The-Prog
Feb 2021
#74
+1, I think this fight will make 1/6 look like a picnic ... the crazies will really come out when
uponit7771
Jan 2021
#19
Maybe, but then when Democrats are elected everywhere, they will crawl back
PatrickforO
Jan 2021
#24
My understanding is the federal government can standardize for security reasons etc. If we don't ...
uponit7771
Jan 2021
#30
Call our awesome Colorado Secretary of State, Jena Griswold, if you want to know how to do it!
colorado_ufo
Jan 2021
#27
In even years, Democrats receive ballot requests from the Texas Democratic Party in January
yellowdogintexas
Jan 2021
#29
Congress can enforce such measures for House and Senate elections, but the Constitution still
Goodheart
Jan 2021
#31
We've had VBM in Oregon for over 20 years. Ballots due by the end of election day. They would avoid
Amaryllis
Jan 2021
#32
If they are including funding provisions to carry out the law ("spending" ) it could
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2021
#46
+1, its a slanted article no doubt ... if we thought 1/6 was crazy this is going to bring the Trump
uponit7771
Jan 2021
#60
In addition, laws around mail ballots should be standardized for all states.
Lonestarblue
Jan 2021
#47
The Democratic party should demand a paper trail and verifiable ability to recount be on all voting
UCmeNdc
Jan 2021
#53
We should allow everyone to vote by mail, and declare Voting Day a national holiday.
Nitram
Jan 2021
#61
This is outrageous! Deep State trying to do what's safe and makes sense. Damn them! nt
JustABozoOnThisBus
Jan 2021
#67
This is a necessary step, but forgive me if I wait for another source other than Rawstory. n/t
Tarheel_Dem
Jan 2021
#71