Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(33,424 posts)

9. A good financial move on his part.

Sun Jan 31, 2021, 08:13 PM

Jan 2021

He was convicted in 1986 and refused to resign. So he kept his judicial salary for 7 years until the SC handed down their decision in 1993.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A question for the legal experts? [View all] kentuck Jan 2021 OP

non-expert here Qutzupalotl Jan 2021 #2

I'm not a lawyer PJMcK Jan 2021 #3

The SC will not honor a request from either Congress or Trump. former9thward Jan 2021 #4

This is the correct answer. 👆🏻 SoonerPride Jan 2021 #5

Thanks! kentuck Jan 2021 #11

True. This can't be appealed StarfishSaver Jan 2021 #14

True. No one is being deprived of their life, liberty or property. Mr.Bill Jan 2021 #13

A good financial move on his part. former9thward Jan 2021 #9

The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction in impeachment. TwilightZone Jan 2021 #7

Not a legal expert, but to offer opinion, Baked Potato Jan 2021 #8

Even if by some strange circumstance, SCOTUS does get involved... paleotn Jan 2021 #10

The Court won't take such a case StarfishSaver Jan 2021 #12

Interesting. kentuck Jan 2021 #16

Yes, he would. And yes, he does. StarfishSaver Jan 2021 #17

Well, Trump being Trump, Mr.Bill Jan 2021 #15

No, they cannot ask the Supreme Court for anything lettucebe Jan 2021 #18

'I put several of you SC justices in office. You owe me.' keithbvadu2 Jan 2021 #19