General Discussion

R B Garr

(17,965 posts)

27. Actually, you are the one who took it and ran with it.

Reply to Celerity (Reply #23)

Wed Feb 3, 2021, 01:03 PM

Feb 2021

You’ve even noticed the same thing I have about the plethora of AOC threads.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

200 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NY-SEN: Schumer quietly nails down the left amid AOC primary chatter [View all] RandySF Feb 2021 OP

Duplicate (and the author is a Politico perpetual shitstirrer in regards to Dems) Celerity Feb 2021 #1

Since when are duplicates a problem? R B Garr Feb 2021 #2

its the exact same article, on the same speculative subject, and the other thread is quite large nt Celerity Feb 2021 #3

Don't you kick a lot of days old AOC threads for R B Garr Feb 2021 #5

no, you must have me confused with someone else nt Celerity Feb 2021 #6

There were minimal responses to the threads you kicked, R B Garr Feb 2021 #7

What threads? Give me examples. Me simply replying to an OP about AOC is hardly some nefarious thing Celerity Feb 2021 #9

I gave this thread as an example. R B Garr Feb 2021 #12

'so why are some with minimal responses kicked for exposure after a couple days' Celerity Feb 2021 #18

You seemed concerned with this duplicate thread R B Garr Feb 2021 #20

lol, talk about projection, all I posted was that it was a duplicate of another, much replied to OP Celerity Feb 2021 #23

Actually, you are the one who took it and ran with it. R B Garr Feb 2021 #27

I did not 'run with it' at all. All my initial responses were very short 'subject line only' replies Celerity Feb 2021 #109

This is quite a disproportionate reaction. R B Garr Feb 2021 #111

This message was self-deleted by its author R B Garr Feb 2021 #10

This wasn't good the first time. Why should we care about this considering the source? Demsrule86 Feb 2021 #17

The source quoted here is from Justice Democrats, her R B Garr Feb 2021 #4

No one should be primaried...we have a razor thing majority...only Republican seats should be Demsrule86 Feb 2021 #16

Exactly! I loathe them, as well. They were founded by an R B Garr Feb 2021 #29

And I have heard he takes money from Republicans. Demsrule86 Feb 2021 #54

Media manufactured story Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #8

The source quoted was from Justice Democrats, and their R B Garr Feb 2021 #11

Doesn't change the fact that she has never Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #13

She never said she wasn't either...she could have so who knows. Demsrule86 Feb 2021 #15

That is like saying Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #19

Justice Democrats is the source. Has she R B Garr Feb 2021 #22

Actually they are not Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #24

They mention others only as an aside to her. R B Garr Feb 2021 #28

No Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #31

There is nothing incorrect in the article about AOC R B Garr Feb 2021 #32

And they never mention her name Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #33

Sources close to her are Justice Democrats. And she didn't R B Garr Feb 2021 #35

You're whole argument Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #37

Her own words agree with the article. She has spoken R B Garr Feb 2021 #39

Please post the quote Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #42

This is more falseness. The article doesn't say she is starting a primary campaign. R B Garr Feb 2021 #44

What quotes? Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #45

Her quotes match what Justice Democrats is talking about. R B Garr Feb 2021 #49

Again not one of these articles have a Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #52

Both sources say she has thought about it, as she hasn't R B Garr Feb 2021 #55

Then produce the quotes Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #59

I've already produced pages of them. The article R B Garr Feb 2021 #60

No you have not Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #62

Now your switching your criteria. The article doesn't R B Garr Feb 2021 #64

What was her answer? /nt tonedevil Feb 2021 #66

Yes she answered Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #67

Didn't she give some measurable milestones she R B Garr Feb 2021 #69

No she didn't Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #71

Sure she's discussed measurable milestones. If politicians don't parrot Justice Democrats R B Garr Feb 2021 #76

Again your argument is based on the what she didn't say Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #78

You cling to this false talking point, but that's not even what the article states. R B Garr Feb 2021 #80

Not a false talking point Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #82

Where are the quotes saying she is not going to primary Schumer? R B Garr Feb 2021 #83

I don't have to prove a negative Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #85

So there is some possibility... tonedevil Feb 2021 #86

Odd the shifting standards you embrace. LanternWaste Feb 2021 #93

No idea what you are talking about Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #94

If it is all over media...most folks would say...no not true if it wasn't true...she probably enjoys Demsrule86 Feb 2021 #56

As one politician once said Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #58

The source is Justice Democrats, not the media. R B Garr Feb 2021 #21

No it's not Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #25

Waleed Shahid is quoted from Justice Democrats . R B Garr Feb 2021 #26

And he never says her name Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #30

This is a false analysis of the article. You make it R B Garr Feb 2021 #34

No what is false is to claim that Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #36

"referring to a challenge by her or another progressive candidate" R B Garr Feb 2021 #41

No I highlighted the exact quote by Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #43

Actually, the spin is yours. R B Garr Feb 2021 #46

The article thus the reporter Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #47

The "her" referred to is AOC. The article title is about AOC. It's not about another mystery "her" R B Garr Feb 2021 #48

And the title is written by the reporter Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #51

That's not what the article even states. It's a false R B Garr Feb 2021 #53

She answered and didn't say she was considering it Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #57

I've produced pages on the subject and there are many R B Garr Feb 2021 #61

She was asked directly... tonedevil Feb 2021 #63

And I could produce pages that say Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #65

LOL. Justice Democrats is the source. They are known R B Garr Feb 2021 #68

And they never said they said they were going to primary Schumer either Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #70

There are pages of the media dialogues with AOC. R B Garr Feb 2021 #72

If there are Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #73

This article isn't about her announcing her candidacy. R B Garr Feb 2021 #74

No I'm taking the angle that JD never said Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #75

They weren't asked about "definitely". That is your spin. Their milestones for going after R B Garr Feb 2021 #77

And where in that quote Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #79

Again, who is the other mystery "she" the article is referring to? R B Garr Feb 2021 #81

Which is what the reporter wrote Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #84

So there was no real "she" person that the article was referencing, even though AOC quotes R B Garr Feb 2021 #87

An article written by a reporter Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #88

"she" is the subject. You are stating that the "she" is not AOC. R B Garr Feb 2021 #89

And the subject of the article is Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #90

So who is the "she" the reporter is referring to? R B Garr Feb 2021 #91

Why does that matter? Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #92

Ah, now we're discounting the gender and really going full denial. R B Garr Feb 2021 #95

No we are discounting what the reporter wrote Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #96

AOC has been quoted on this same matter and you've even quoted her here. R B Garr Feb 2021 #97

Yes she has been quoted Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #98

The article doesn't say she was starting a campaign. Provide quotes stating she is not R B Garr Feb 2021 #99

And that line was written by the reporter Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #100

But the line is true, right? The left wing group Justice Democrats recruited AOC. R B Garr Feb 2021 #101

Yes they did Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #102

So you're saying the article isn't about AOC? R B Garr Feb 2021 #103

No I'm saying that the article Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #104

There are AOC quotes and Justice Democrat quotes. R B Garr Feb 2021 #105

Again I don't have to prove a negative Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #106

AOC has been quoted on this matter, as well as Justice R B Garr Feb 2021 #107

Then produce the quotes Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #108

I've asked for the quotes that say she is not running against him. R B Garr Feb 2021 #110

That is silly... tonedevil Feb 2021 #112

There are no quotes from AOC saying that Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #114

It fits the logic model. /nt tonedevil Feb 2021 #116

There are also no quotes of Nancy Pelosi denying Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #118

Except I don't have to prove a negative. Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #113

You are the one making the "allegation" that AOC R B Garr Feb 2021 #115

No never said she is not running Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #117

Yes, please stop playing games since you R B Garr Feb 2021 #119

Then post the AOC quotes you Googled Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #120

You are twisting what I said, so please quit playing games. R B Garr Feb 2021 #121

What quotes? Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #122

LOL, the quotes are posted a few times in this thread, so please re-read. R B Garr Feb 2021 #123

That's not what the JD spokesman said Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #124

The female being discussed is AOC. R B Garr Feb 2021 #126

According to the reporter Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #127

That is just a weird bag of tricks you have going. R B Garr Feb 2021 #128

So the fuck what? tonedevil Feb 2021 #129

No tricks, just the truth Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #134

Your false construction again? There are also no quotes saying R B Garr Feb 2021 #135

There are no quotes that she's not a vampire either Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #136

Your whole premise about quotes is out the window when you apply basic R B Garr Feb 2021 #137

My whole premise is based on the truth Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #138

Your "premise" is your biased opinion, not "fact", LOL. Basic logic says that your R B Garr Feb 2021 #139

Projection Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #140

Your bias is actually the "projection" R B Garr Feb 2021 #143

No, just facts Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #145

I've asked for one quote saying that she is not considering running, yet you have none. R B Garr Feb 2021 #146

I don't have to prove a negative Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #149

lol, more of your convoluted rules about reading a simple article. Provide quotes R B Garr Feb 2021 #150

No That is twisted logic Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #155

There is no "allegation". There is a simple article that you are attempting to force your R B Garr Feb 2021 #156

Nope Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #158

Yup. You haven't produced one quote saying she is not running against Schumer. R B Garr Feb 2021 #159

Again twisted logic. I don't have to prove a negative. Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #160

Is there one quote from her saying she isn't running? R B Garr Feb 2021 #161

Nice evasion Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #162

At least you are off the "evasion" that this article R B Garr Feb 2021 #163

Great so you admit that when she was asked the question Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #164

Great, so you admit she didn't say she wasn't thinking R B Garr Feb 2021 #165

No never said the article wasn't about her Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #166

And her own words proved you wrong. She had input R B Garr Feb 2021 #167

Where? Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #168

You already posted it yourself. R B Garr Feb 2021 #169

No Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #170

She also never said she isn't running. Produce R B Garr Feb 2021 #171

Never said that so I don't have to prove a negative Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #173

She never said she wasn't running. Provide a quote R B Garr Feb 2021 #174

Yet still not what I said. Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #175

Fact: She also has not said she is not running. R B Garr Feb 2021 #176

Not the point Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #177

Is the point. Where has anyone "contended" that she *is* running, besides your false R B Garr Feb 2021 #178

Nope Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #179

Yup. Provide quotes that "contend" she is running, since all you have is your false R B Garr Feb 2021 #180

No Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #181

Yes. You wouldn't even admit this thread was about her until her own words R B Garr Feb 2021 #182

Nope Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #183

How do you tolerate such boldfaced lies? tonedevil Feb 2021 #185

Post quotes where someone says she is running. R B Garr Feb 2021 #186

No one said she's running Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #187

I'm glad you admit you've spent 2 days "contending" R B Garr Feb 2021 #188

Chatter, defined as Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #189

Isn't chatter right in the title? I think where you went wrong was R B Garr Feb 2021 #190

Bless your heart Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #191

You were even emphatic that it might not be about a female. R B Garr Feb 2021 #192

Nope Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #193

Yup. And I'm glad you finally focused on the R B Garr Feb 2021 #194

Always did Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #195

LOL R B Garr Feb 2021 #196

Bazinga! Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #197

Chatter. R B Garr Feb 2021 #198

LULZ Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #199

Yup. Thanks for confirming the unseriousness. R B Garr Feb 2021 #200

Piece together several of quotes of hers and one could easily draw that conclusion.... George II Feb 2021 #147

No that's is just not true. Dem4Life1102 Feb 2021 #148

It's almost as if there is no reason... tonedevil Feb 2021 #40

This was posted at least three times...and AOC is not threat to Schumer. Demsrule86 Feb 2021 #14

Yet another Holly Gottawhine piece. Politico: where writers go to die. NurseJackie Feb 2021 #38

I've been wanting to say the same thing for a long time BlueLucy Feb 2021 #125

You want to critique someone's writing... tonedevil Feb 2021 #130

I don't know what you're talking about. BlueLucy Feb 2021 #131

NurseJackie called the author... tonedevil Feb 2021 #132

Perhaps BlueLucy was referring to the (correct) characterization of Politico? George II Feb 2021 #142

Since the subject of the post... tonedevil Feb 2021 #151

The subject line also contained "Politico: where writers go to die" George II Feb 2021 #152

If you think petty mockery is cool I can't stop you from showing us who you are. tonedevil Feb 2021 #153

So how, in your eyes, did I show "who I am", and what might that be? George II Feb 2021 #172

Someone who overlooks name calling. /nt tonedevil Feb 2021 #184

Very true about this reporter! If not for seeing AOCs R B Garr Feb 2021 #133

Hah, nice play on words - so who would write a shit-stirring article? "Holly wood"..... George II Feb 2021 #141

She's the type of reporter to cut and pasted a campaign PRESS RELEASE... NurseJackie Feb 2021 #144

At least she has a last name you can mock. /nt tonedevil Feb 2021 #154

... NurseJackie Feb 2021 #157

Wow, I can only see two responses! demmiblue Feb 2021 #50