Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Scottish parliament votes against probing Trump finances [View all]Denzil_DC
(8,992 posts)24. "I don't think you quite understand the Scots."
LOL. Check out my profile. I actually LIVE in Scotland, and have done for 30+ years. That's perhaps why I understand the issues better than you do.
No, I'm not "strangely on his side", any more than Humza Yousaf is.
As for my being "in the wrong place", the idea of abusing political powers that you advocate sounds quite ... Trumpian. Forgive us if we're not prepared to debase ourselves to satisfy you.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I stopped feeling bad about everything England ever did to them after I read up on their...
tenderfoot
Feb 2021
#7
the vote in Holyrood, amended so the power of investigation goes to the Civil Recovery Unit (CRU)
Celerity
Feb 2021
#6
Perhaps you'll be persuaded by some explanation of how UWOs fit in to legal proceedings.
Denzil_DC
Feb 2021
#25
I actually had went and looked at those cases before I replied initially, I stand by my stance
Celerity
Feb 2021
#26
I am not changing my mind, sorry, and it is simply an investigation, it is not like Holyrood is
Celerity
Feb 2021
#29
The key point is that it would be "simply an investigation" with no current legal basis.
Denzil_DC
Feb 2021
#31
The power to call for an Unexplained Wealth Order always did rest with the CRU.
Denzil_DC
Feb 2021
#18
perhaps I should have said remains with, but in this case it could have been triggered by Holyrood
Celerity
Feb 2021
#27
that's subjective spin and framing, as I've already pointed out in multiple replies on this thread
Celerity
Feb 2021
#30
"subjective spin and framing" would be ignoring the need for LEGAL JUSTIFICATION for an UWO
Denzil_DC
Feb 2021
#32
Not rebutted at all to my satisfaction. We are just going to have to agree to disagree, much like
Celerity
Feb 2021
#33
Well, I don't think any of us in Scotland are satisfied with Trump's very existence,
Denzil_DC
Feb 2021
#35
I respect your opinion, and I can see your points. Hopefully the shitehawk eventually sees justice
Celerity
Feb 2021
#36
Oh, we had every reason to have contempt for Trump even before he became President.
Denzil_DC
Feb 2021
#38
