Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

halfulglas

(1,654 posts)
14. The shorted-sighted cycle never ends.
Mon Feb 8, 2021, 02:03 AM
Feb 2021

How many remember the short-sighted of the American auto makers in the 70's. Yes, they made some beautiful cars in the 60's and 70's, but while Washington was trying to mandate improving fuel standards. The companies fought the tooth and nail with not only lobbyists but got the unions to back them. "We can't afford to make the design changes. It costs too much money. We will have to retool the assembly lines." The unions told the government, "You can't do this. It's going to cost us jobs." They kept delaying the dates mandating of the fuel standards to take effect.

Well what happened of course is that Detroit kept taking their sales money but continuing to design the same gas hogs every year thinking the world wanted cars as big as boats at big prices. The car execs of course got their huge salaries.

What was happening was that the world was buying smaller cars, more gas efficient. Americans who couldn't afford the big Detroit gas hogs and were also buying fuel efficient German and Japanese cars, then even Korean cars. Americans were being called not patriotic for buying foreign cars they could afford. It was fashionable in Detroit to make fun of Japanese cars as not safe and pieces of tin but American car makers were starting to take on some foreign "partners" who didn't want to pay union wages and built their own cars in states other than Michigan. Car makers started blaming their financial troubles on the high wages they paid their union workers and the funding of their pension plans.

Of course, the point I'm making is that yes, the Detroit auto makers were short sighted in not thinking ahead, but they might have been forced to if the unions didn't join them. If the union execs would have looked in the driveways of their own members, they might have realized that even in Detroit, foreign cars were being driven and there was a reason for it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I have a lot of respect for Dick Trumpka but in his scenerio 100 families aren't working ... marble falls Feb 2021 #1
"Keystone decision will cost 1,000 existing union jobs and 10,000 projected construction jobs. " Takket Feb 2021 #2
So what? Do you want to lose PA Senate seat and PA next presidential? dem4decades Feb 2021 #11
Yeah. So what? Takket Feb 2021 #34
What do you think the blue collar job market is going to look like when Miami is under water? Act_of_Reparation Feb 2021 #35
In the long run, you are right about wnylib Feb 2021 #13
Thinking only about the short term BarackTheVote Feb 2021 #36
Most of those 11,000 jobs are temporary, anyway. GoCubsGo Feb 2021 #23
How does the "temporary" work a Laborer does on a pipeline translate to a "more permanent WhiskeyGrinder Feb 2021 #27
I never said that a temporary pipeline job translates into a more permanent clean energy job. GoCubsGo Feb 2021 #37
What you said was, "Not only could those workers be put to work on more permanent clean energy WhiskeyGrinder Feb 2021 #40
ALL construction jobs are "temporary" former9thward Feb 2021 #30
???? GoCubsGo Feb 2021 #38
No, it will CREATE jobs. Goodheart Feb 2021 #3
So much this! Celerity Feb 2021 #15
So true treestar Feb 2021 #39
Red herring and he knows it. 2naSalit Feb 2021 #4
+1000! n/t Hiawatha Pete Feb 2021 #7
"The Keystone pipeline will create just 35 permanent jobs" Hiawatha Pete Feb 2021 #5
As Conan O'Brien said, it will create hundreds of jobs. Unfortunately, most of those jobs will FSogol Feb 2021 #29
+1000 n/t Hiawatha Pete Feb 2021 #33
Build something that causes less potential environmental damage and bad will? Repair infrastructure? Freethinker65 Feb 2021 #6
What use is the Oglalla aquifer when 1,000 jobs might go away? gratuitous Feb 2021 #8
Way to play into the hands of Republicans, Trumpka. SunSeeker Feb 2021 #9
I come from a strong union family and a problem SharonClark Feb 2021 #10
This is what some on the left don't get JI7 Feb 2021 #12
Will no one think of the out of work lamplighter? Electricity is taking all the good jobs! Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2021 #19
and buggy whips.... omg all the buggy whip makers - all out of work - n/t Locrian Feb 2021 #22
The shorted-sighted cycle never ends. halfulglas Feb 2021 #14
How many of those project jobs are Canadian.... Historic NY Feb 2021 #16
None. former9thward Feb 2021 #31
Republicans would have us sacrifice all our values and morals for a single job. KY_EnviroGuy Feb 2021 #17
+1000 Celerity Feb 2021 #18
Won't other infrastructure projects mean more construction jobs? dansolo Feb 2021 #20
He is both right and wrong. KentuckyWoman Feb 2021 #21
"Those jobs were temporary." So? That's how construction employment works. WhiskeyGrinder Feb 2021 #24
The purpose of the pipeline is to reduce costs and increase profits for the oil companies. Kaleva Feb 2021 #25
My understanding is that jobs are being created during construction, panader0 Feb 2021 #26
A better alternative would be to build a refinery in Canada. Kaleva Feb 2021 #28
They don't want to desecrate their land Historic NY Feb 2021 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Top union leader: Biden's...»Reply #14