Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
8. That requires substituting my assumptions for data
Wed Oct 10, 2012, 01:10 PM
Oct 2012

I can look at a poll result and say, "I do not think that will happen." Perhaps latino voters get more excited about elections at the last minute.

I am not saying that the result is certain to match voting behavior a month from now.

I am, however, saying that if more Latinos, for whatever reason, are telling pollsters they are less than 100% certain to vote then the pollster cannot arbitrarily count them as likely voters.

Polls are measurements, not predictions.

Imagine if latinos this year were telling pollsters they are going to vote 100%.

Could the pollster reduce the latino weighting in likely voters because the pollster didn't buy the result because that was a lot higher than they actually voted in 2008?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Problem With the Pew ...»Reply #8