General Discussion

vsrazdem

(2,194 posts)

7. If you read the article you would see that they were not "required" to represent

Thu Feb 11, 2021, 08:10 PM

Feb 2021

Devoss in this case. She already has a private lawyer representing her. These students are trying to get back the money that the Dept of Education garnished from their accounts after the course already told them to stop, and they disregarded the court's order. There is no reason for the DOJ to be on the side of Devoss. Biden has aready removed the DOJ out of other lawsuits, so there is no reason he cannot do this for these students. This is a no brainer.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I hope the president puts a stop to this. [View all] vsrazdem Feb 2021 OP

Joe Biden Said He Would Be 100% Hands Off So Far As DOJ Matters Are Concerned sfstaxprep Feb 2021 #1

yes, for investigations. This is the DOJ representing Devoss, when they do not have to. vsrazdem Feb 2021 #3

They're not her personal lawyer. Biden should call them off. lagomorph777 Feb 2021 #10

He can't put a stop to a court ruling treestar Feb 2021 #2

This is not regarding a court ruling. it is regarding DOJ representing Devoss. vsrazdem Feb 2021 #4

They are supposed to treestar Feb 2021 #5

They don't have to if the case is bad faith in the first place uponit7771 Feb 2021 #6

If you read the article you would see that they were not "required" to represent vsrazdem Feb 2021 #7

Has a private lawyer, and a boat load of money..awful that ppl like her abuse the system Thekaspervote Feb 2021 #8

The Department of Education is involved. treestar Feb 2021 #9