General Discussion

AlinPA

(15,071 posts)

19. Yes, reasonably so. But with all the crap Fox "news" transmits, people respect their “polls”?

Wed Oct 10, 2012, 06:48 PM

Oct 2012

Hannity, Palin, Rove, O’Reilly, VanSustern, Cavuto, especially the idiots in the morning (Fox and Friends), and they are called a news organization?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FAUX News Poll Romney 46/ Obama 45 LV Oct 7 to Oct 9 [View all] jezebel Oct 2012 OP

Not bad Shivering Jemmy Oct 2012 #1

I just checked. Its 46-44 Obama/Romney. jezebel Oct 2012 #3

That is the most frustrating thing about this election... Drunken Irishman Oct 2012 #5

Post-debate, pre-jobs report, huh? sadbear Oct 2012 #2

No. It was taken between Oct. 7th to Oct. 9th... Drunken Irishman Oct 2012 #4

The chances that FAUX News was going to publish a poll at odds with the narrative they favor jsmirman Oct 2012 #6

So how do you explain the September numbers where Obama led by 5%? Blue Yorker Oct 2012 #14

Fox 'news" is not a credible news channel, they never were. This includes their "polls". AlinPA Oct 2012 #17

Is Ipsos credible? Blue Yorker Oct 2012 #18

Yes, reasonably so. But with all the crap Fox "news" transmits, people respect their “polls”? AlinPA Oct 2012 #19

Hannity and Rove don't go out there and poll people Blue Yorker Oct 2012 #22

Defending Fox “news’ as credible just because they publish a number that happens to agree with some AlinPA Oct 2012 #23

Bullshit. Impossibly simple. jsmirman Oct 2012 #20

August poll: Romney 45, Obama 44 ProSense Oct 2012 #7

I never believed for a second that Fox does anything to promote public awareness...... busterbrown Oct 2012 #8

That's a very intricate conspiracy theory Blue Yorker Oct 2012 #11

Exactly! Very Clever...... busterbrown Oct 2012 #30

it is not horrible. hrmjustin Oct 2012 #9

That is near enough for Obama to still be ahead in enough swing states. Democratopia Oct 2012 #10

Has anyone else noticed that Romney is always stuck between 46-47%? aaaaaa5a Oct 2012 #12

Look at these numbers for Romney in the FOX news poll aaaaaa5a Oct 2012 #13

Again - do people seriously think Fox was going to publish a poll showing the bounce dissipating? jsmirman Oct 2012 #15

Would you say the Fox poll is in line, worse, or better than others from a similar period? Blue Yorker Oct 2012 #16

I don't understand your question, prosense has likely answered it in this thread jsmirman Oct 2012 #21

The conspiratorial view would work if Fox had put Romney ahead by more than 1% Blue Yorker Oct 2012 #24

You are getting to the point of being ridiculous jsmirman Oct 2012 #26

Are you he who determines the purity of post-debate dates? Blue Yorker Oct 2012 #28

The idea that we're not all waiting to see post-jobs number days jsmirman Oct 2012 #29

Are you sure you will believe all polls conducted post-jobs-report? Blue Yorker Oct 2012 #32

I'm not a poll denier. This is FOX FUCKING NEWS. jsmirman Oct 2012 #33

has any expert discussed the relationship between Intrade and polls? Blue Yorker Oct 2012 #34

It's a market. Like any market. If this were significant news, it would have moved it. jsmirman Oct 2012 #35

Something must have happened since the Fox poll, because it's 61.6% now Blue Yorker Oct 2012 #37

Think of why the body of your post doesn't make sense jsmirman Oct 2012 #39

62.8% now, btw jsmirman Oct 2012 #40

I seriously think you need to answer as to whether you are aware that this is the first jsmirman Oct 2012 #27

You are misinformed, and your reasoning is strange Blue Yorker Oct 2012 #31

And let me try to assuage your concerns like so jsmirman Oct 2012 #25

This FUX with News poll is screwed up. tarheelsunc Oct 2012 #36

Estimated 67 million people saw the debate but Fox poll puts it way too high at 78% Democratopia Oct 2012 #38