Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NPR on the Texas Shitshow...arghhhhhhhhh [View all]Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,940 posts)43. Never mind the fact that there often is multiple sides to ANY issue - why must
everything, but everything, be reduced to two either-or lib vs. con polarities???
Opening our minds to more free ranging discussions might result in more actual solutions to problems being found. I realize that may be beyond the intellectual capcity of most Americans.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I haven't seen that on MSNBC or CNN. I gave up on NPR more than a decade ago.
Crunchy Frog
Feb 2021
#2
Never mind the fact that there often is multiple sides to ANY issue - why must
Kashkakat v.2.0
Feb 2021
#43
NPR gets a lot of money from the fossil fuel industry, their reporting is worse than ABC or NBC. nt
yaesu
Feb 2021
#11
After too many cases of yelling at NPR and slapping the "off" button, I gave up on them.
NBachers
Feb 2021
#12
NPR has some good programing but their news reporting is slanted right. They always give more time
List left
Feb 2021
#16
I have been defending that kind of behaviour, saying NPR has to tiptoe around sometimes.
BobTheSubgenius
Feb 2021
#17