Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZSkiffyGeek

(12,744 posts)
37. If they were making $3230K before the pandemic...
Wed Mar 3, 2021, 12:41 PM
Mar 2021

They didn't get the first stimulus. So if their income dropped that significantly, they're getting more than they did before.
I'm kinda shocked that after weeks of screams about keeping the money out of poor peoples' hands, we're now going after 6-figure incomes.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I get my promised stimulus but a lot won't, and this is going to be a big problem in 2022 and 2024 liskddksil Mar 2021 #1
Does that mean a faster phase out after 75K? Or phase-out starts lower? AZSkiffyGeek Mar 2021 #2
Only those making up to $80,000 (single) get anything under this proposal nt liskddksil Mar 2021 #3
faster after 75k dsc Mar 2021 #4
Phased out or zero? DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2021 #10
Sounds like phased from 75-80K AZSkiffyGeek Mar 2021 #12
phased out from what I read dsc Mar 2021 #16
So some people will get $600 from Trump, nothing from Biden? leftstreet Mar 2021 #5
Yes, could be disastrous for us nt liskddksil Mar 2021 #6
No AZSkiffyGeek Mar 2021 #9
What did they get from Trump? leftstreet Mar 2021 #11
If they made more than 75K they got less than 600 AZSkiffyGeek Mar 2021 #15
Something from Trump, nothing from Biden leftstreet Mar 2021 #19
You said $600 AZSkiffyGeek Mar 2021 #25
lol leftstreet Mar 2021 #26
the reduction rate was 5% compared to 28% under this idiotic plan dsc Mar 2021 #21
Only the Democrats can come up with something this dumb nt liskddksil Mar 2021 #30
this was just plain dumb dsc Mar 2021 #32
I received around $341 in December, based on an income in the $80k range. And this bullwinkle428 Mar 2021 #35
Yep and when you screw people out of money they Never forget. sarcasmo Mar 2021 #54
and the bdamomma Mar 2021 #96
This message was self-deleted by its author bullwinkle428 Mar 2021 #39
Actually $1800 from trump. Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2021 #40
+1 leftstreet Mar 2021 #64
Omfg just give the people money. WhiskeyGrinder Mar 2021 #7
+1 Baitball Blogger Mar 2021 #20
I think this is a mistake. Elessar Zappa Mar 2021 #8
Tons? qazplm135 Mar 2021 #28
I'm not sure about exactly how many will be affected Elessar Zappa Mar 2021 #31
You are talking about qazplm135 Mar 2021 #44
Ok, I re-read the proposal Elessar Zappa Mar 2021 #68
Those are 2019 numbers for most MoonlitKnight Mar 2021 #73
that's why they need to file their taxes qazplm135 Mar 2021 #85
Many cannot file yet MoonlitKnight Mar 2021 #88
I don't see why this is a problem mcar Mar 2021 #13
Two reasons that I can see. Elessar Zappa Mar 2021 #17
3rd reason: 2019 income doesn't always indicate 2021 need Bonn1997 Mar 2021 #86
Just because a couple makes $160,000 doesn't mean they don't need it. Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2021 #23
If they were making $3230K before the pandemic... AZSkiffyGeek Mar 2021 #37
I pretty much agree with you Victor_c3 Mar 2021 #24
It's not just about individuals Tommymac Mar 2021 #79
This is stupid on steroids dsc Mar 2021 #14
They should agree to this, then do ANOTHER stimulus in June, this time just direct payments LaMouffette Mar 2021 #18
They cannot do another one, it will be filibustered and zero chance 10 Rethugs cross over Celerity Mar 2021 #77
Can we at least try? I think we should try. Trying seems to be a good idea. ahoysrcsm Mar 2021 #83
Oh, we will try a lot of things, and there will be a lot of filibusters. Celerity Mar 2021 #84
This DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2021 #22
In theory, it isn't so bad. mvd Mar 2021 #27
the people who lost income and haven't filed would have the money delayed not denied dsc Mar 2021 #29
I can see that point mvd Mar 2021 #34
A phase out seems fairer DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2021 #36
So what happens if this passes the Senate. It still doesn't match the House proposal. OrlandoDem2 Mar 2021 #33
Yep. It goes to conference committee. More delays and more chances for RW BS. Sibelius Fan Mar 2021 #41
it would have gone either way since the 15 min wage is gone dsc Mar 2021 #42
Thanks! I wonder if they'll just split the baby at $87.5K/$175K OrlandoDem2 Mar 2021 #46
Just Brilliant. Just gave Republicans a reason to say this is why they didn't vote for it Thrill Mar 2021 #38
Some kind of compromise with republicans PatSeg Mar 2021 #43
This is not a Compromise with Republicans - not one will vote for this. It is a compromise liskddksil Mar 2021 #45
So people who made over $80,000 or $160,000 PatSeg Mar 2021 #49
some might dsc Mar 2021 #50
We can't please everyone all the time PatSeg Mar 2021 #51
This isn't about not pleasing dsc Mar 2021 #52
Actually the income caps are higher, Deminpenn Mar 2021 #57
Thank you PatSeg Mar 2021 #59
Excerpt from the story in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Deminpenn Mar 2021 #61
Nope the start of the phase out remains the same as it was dsc Mar 2021 #62
That is not what the story says Deminpenn Mar 2021 #66
I don't know what story you are referring to dsc Mar 2021 #69
Or they'll just stay home. Ace Rothstein Mar 2021 #74
After spending 8 years in the Obama administration notinkansas Mar 2021 #71
Not a terrible compromise Deminpenn Mar 2021 #47
That's actually not as bad as it could have been. tritsofme Mar 2021 #48
Getting the schools re-opened is a bigger deal for suburban parents Deminpenn Mar 2021 #53
Yes it seems silly for $75,000 to get the full amount and $80,000 to get zero mvd Mar 2021 #56
As someone who likely would have qualified for a reduced check Deminpenn Mar 2021 #58
Agree. Celerity Mar 2021 #82
Thank you for that clarification. I agree it's not so bad. OrlandoDem2 Mar 2021 #55
This is NOT going to win any goops wellst0nev0ter Mar 2021 #60
This is stupid. dawg Mar 2021 #63
Well, the $400/wk extra unemployment was kept Deminpenn Mar 2021 #65
The difference between 400 and 300 is 100 MoonlitKnight Mar 2021 #76
It's 400/wk, which is down from the 600/wk Deminpenn Mar 2021 #93
Totally unforced error budkin Mar 2021 #67
All because of Manchin. Nt helpisontheway Mar 2021 #70
I would place blame on him bdamomma Mar 2021 #98
In exchange for what? MoonlitKnight Mar 2021 #72
Can Breyer retire already so we can replace him then kick Manchin from the party? Ace Rothstein Mar 2021 #75
They need to stop giving working people money. I have MVP Kamala Mar 2021 #78
My husband and I are both service-connected disabled. marie999 Mar 2021 #81
It is a STIMULUS check, not aid obamanut2012 Mar 2021 #87
Than why is there an arbitrarily income limit at all? MichMan Mar 2021 #89
There shouldn't be. But out of touch Senators, including on our side, seem to have a problem liskddksil Mar 2021 #91
But I don't need that extra $341 to spend, I have it already MVP Kamala Mar 2021 #94
I really fucking hate this... Wounded Bear Mar 2021 #80
Tell ya the truth, I'm shocked we're getting anything at all. msfiddlestix Mar 2021 #90
Why this isn't enough Liberty Belle Mar 2021 #92
Thanks an effing lot, Biden and "moderate" Dems. mnhtnbb Mar 2021 #95
IRA Drb2072 Mar 2021 #97
I'm retired and most of my income mnhtnbb Mar 2021 #99
More blue state bailouts of red states lostnfound Mar 2021 #100
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Biden has agreed to narro...»Reply #37