Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Prometheus Bound

(3,489 posts)
49. I don't see what the confusion is.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 04:15 AM
Jan 2012

I understand he want to close down a hundred and some bases and spend money defending America instead of spending money on bases all over the world and bombing people and shit. He's saying it would cost a lot less to defend America that way and America woud be safer.

I just read headlines and I got it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Do you think that $4 trillion+ in wars has made us safer? MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #1
Well, ProSense Jan 2012 #2
I think he cares MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #3
So ProSense Jan 2012 #5
You're misquoting Paul MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #8
Ah ProSense Jan 2012 #11
Please confirm: 100% of money spent on the military contributes to our defense MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #15
So ProSense Jan 2012 #18
If you can't answer my simple question in public, then MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #21
Nice ProSense Jan 2012 #24
You know this dsc Jan 2012 #50
He's lying on "this specific issue." Damn liar, and everyone who trusted him is looking... joshcryer Jan 2012 #6
Of course he cares. He cares about Ron Paul. And he cares a lot about Ron Paul. REP Jan 2012 #47
Ron Paul will balance the budget "without cutting from...national defense" DJ13 Jan 2012 #4
No ProSense Jan 2012 #9
he has been attacking the MIC. He's pushing propaganda. DJ13 Jan 2012 #10
Hmmm? ProSense Jan 2012 #12
Woah. girl gone mad Jan 2012 #37
I agree with you that's being read wrong, but "calmly and deliberately" is definitely a shift. joshcryer Jan 2012 #13
Wrong? ProSense Jan 2012 #20
He ties it to overseas spending in the very speech you link. joshcryer Jan 2012 #25
And ProSense Jan 2012 #27
Yes, so 1 for Paul, 1 for you. Should've left it at the Afghanistan policy shift. joshcryer Jan 2012 #29
Huh? ProSense Jan 2012 #32
True, but they won't read it that way. He's "getting out of Afghanistan!" joshcryer Jan 2012 #33
Well, ProSense Jan 2012 #35
It's mish mashed rhetoric. Some can read it the way you do. They're lied to. joshcryer Jan 2012 #36
True ProSense Jan 2012 #38
Yes, but you're not playing the game... Skip Intro Jan 2012 #16
Or we can judge things piece by piece and agree and disagree on what parts... joshcryer Jan 2012 #19
It's **RON PAUL**. He's made a career of not making sense. baldguy Jan 2012 #7
I think the point he is trying to make (poorly) Motown_Johnny Jan 2012 #14
it's simple SixthSense Jan 2012 #17
Good luck getting the contractors out of the military, Paul Canuckistanian Jan 2012 #22
Why would anyone believe a career politician?! FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #23
Does that include Obama? Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #26
Obama will be retired before he is. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #34
Because ProSense Jan 2012 #28
That's a doozy of a post, right there!! Major Hogwash Jan 2012 #30
Ron Paul doesn't even have any endorsements. Major Hogwash Jan 2012 #31
Wow, Bush and McCain endorsed Romney, so... JackRiddler Jan 2012 #42
MIC slipslidingaway Jan 2012 #39
. ProSense Jan 2012 #40
Monkey pancakes. n/t Rincewind Jan 2012 #41
I would love to know BootinUp Jan 2012 #44
EarlG posted it in an image, can't find an earlier variant: joshcryer Jan 2012 #45
We get it, we get it: You prefer Romney. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #43
I'm confused here jmowreader Jan 2012 #46
He's a truthteller n/t ProSense Jan 2012 #52
He followed those statements with a 20 minute... MilesColtrane Jan 2012 #48
I don't see what the confusion is. Prometheus Bound Jan 2012 #49
The only way you wouldn't get it is if you didn't want to get it. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #54
A squirrel could go up one leg and down the other madokie Jan 2012 #51
It's telling that you choose this point of attack. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #53
Hmmm? ProSense Jan 2012 #55
Muh-huh? JackRiddler Jan 2012 #56
There ProSense Jan 2012 #57
What you really want to "leave alone" is the military industrial complex. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #60
Funny how he mentions the Soviets spending themselves to oblivion Blue_Tires Jan 2012 #58
Excellent point, and ProSense Jan 2012 #59
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What the hell is Ron Paul...»Reply #49