Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Three House Republicans Targeted For Jan 6 'Involvement' [View all]Warpy
(114,518 posts)25. Depends on the CO constitution
A lot of states would have an interim appointment u8ntil a special election could be done.
Boebert is a space shot and a total gunloon but not quite in the same league as Brooks and Gosar. Those two have really got to go, even though their districts would likely elect other nasty Republicans.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Remove them from office, throw their worthless traitorous asses in the hooskow!
634-5789
Mar 2021
#1
Thank you, Rep. Jayapal! Shouldn't be too hard to figure out if the "tour group" was also present
LaMouffette
Mar 2021
#6
Full hearings. More will be added if this is pursued. Proud Boys contact at White House??
Evolve Dammit
Mar 2021
#7
Not exactly. FBI said no calls between members and insurrectionists on January 6th.
lagomorph777
Mar 2021
#58
Oh, I hadn't previously heard that Brooks also tweeted out Pelosi's location. nt
woodsprite
Mar 2021
#11
Involved? If it walks like an insurrectionist, talks like an insurrectionist,
BobTheSubgenius
Mar 2021
#22
If they are able to tie Boebert directly to the rioters it'll be very interesting
sciencescience
Mar 2021
#33
Traitors deserve death. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on that. nt
Progressive Jones
Mar 2021
#48
