I don't know where to post this: I'd like to kick Woody Allen in his smarmy little

[NanceGreggs]

67. Woody didn't 'convince' me of anything.

The facts did.

Just because a seven-year-old sounds like other seven-year-olds proves nothing.

"Mia said very little, prompting Dylan in monosyllables." Mia alone had access to the children after she made her accusations. They only heard her version of events pre-trial.

But I appreciate your candour, and your honest attribution to 'gut feeling' - which can often obscure the facts.

I have heard from Dylan, then and now. But to see her as an unbiased witness, when she has only heard her mother's version of events for decades, seems rather naive.

Pedophiles are known repeat offenders - so I ask the question again:

Is it feasible that Allen is a pedophile who has never, ever been accused of such behaviour - other than Mia's accusations - over an entire lifetime? The man has deep pockets - why hasn't anyone launched a multi-million dollar sexual abuse suit against him, especially on the heels of Mia's accusations, which would lend to give them 'public opinion' credence?

Why is Woody Allen automatically the "bad guy" - when it was Farrow who claimed that now-Ronan was Woody's child, and later claimed that he was Sinatra's child? What kind of mother does THAT shit?

I am truly appalled that people here are basing their opinions on a so-called 'documentary' that is nothing more than propaganda advancing an agenda.