I don't know where to post this: I'd like to kick Woody Allen in his smarmy little

[NanceGreggs]

181. Here are the facts I rely on ...

Woody has only been accused of pedophilia once in his entire lifetime, and the accusation was made by an embittered ex-wife in the midst of a messy divorce.

That ex-wife has a proven history of deceit and lying when it suits her purposes. Allen has no such reputation for dishonesty, and has never been accused of misconduct with any other child.

Dylan has been raised by her mother, and has had no contact with her father for decades now. So naturally, she has only heard her mother's version of events, and assumes her mother's version is the truth.

Pointing to a one-sided, highly biased 'documentary' as proof of anything is naive at best - just like people who have watched 'documentaries' about Trump's stolen election have been taken-in.

You talk about cherry-picking information - and yet that's exactly what this so-called documentary did.