I don't know where to post this: I'd like to kick Woody Allen in his smarmy little

[Jakes Progress]

204. Who says?

You mean the people that put the one-sided production together? They said they sought Allen's input and you believed them just as you swallowed their sensationalist tripe.

Let's see. A group working hand in hand with a crazy ex-wife says they want you to say something they can edit and change all they want and you decide that you won't play that game. I guess that makes you smart rather than guilty.

There is plenty of "evidence" exonerating Allen that doesn't have to have him speaking or lending credibility to a sleazy hit job. This group chose to ignore it. I put evidence in quotes because all if it is just as legitimate as the "evidence" the film producers chose to use.

Here's some free advice to you too: falling for sleazy sensationalism and making it a part of your personal mission is not a good use of your time. I'm not defending Allen. Again. I don't know what happened. Again. You don't know what happened. You have made a stupid bit of celebrity fluff your reason for existence.

I'm not defending Allen. I'm saying that Democrats don't need to fall for the same sloppy, knee jerk kind of reporting that enthralls republicans who fall for one sided and incomplete stories about immigration, guns, Christmas, and a host of other lies designed to get ratings. I'm defending thinking.