Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Truth about Vitamin D and COVID-19 [View all]womanofthehills
(10,997 posts)28. I totally disagree -
A vitamin that is known to help the immune system sounds good to me. I don't need to take extra vitamin D because I live in NM where the sun shines all the time and I am outdoors half the time. My vit D levels always test high. Also, free range chickens allowed to run outdoors will have high levels of vit D in their yokes. A good way to get extra vit D.
Key recommendations:
There seems nothing to lose and potentially much to gain by recommending vitamin D supplementation for all, e.g. at 8001000 IU/day, making it clear that this is to help ensure immune health and not solely for bone and muscle health.
This should be mandated for prescription in care homes, prisons and other institutions where people are likely to have been indoors for much of the time during the summer.
People likely to be currently deficient should consider taking a higher dose, e.g. 4000 IU/day for the first four weeks before reducing to 800 IU1000 IU/day
People admitted to hospital with COVID-19 should have their vitamin D status checked and/or supplemented and consideration should be given to testing high-dose calcifediol in the RECOVERY trial.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813231/
There seems nothing to lose and potentially much to gain by recommending vitamin D supplementation for all, e.g. at 8001000 IU/day, making it clear that this is to help ensure immune health and not solely for bone and muscle health.
This should be mandated for prescription in care homes, prisons and other institutions where people are likely to have been indoors for much of the time during the summer.
People likely to be currently deficient should consider taking a higher dose, e.g. 4000 IU/day for the first four weeks before reducing to 800 IU1000 IU/day
People admitted to hospital with COVID-19 should have their vitamin D status checked and/or supplemented and consideration should be given to testing high-dose calcifediol in the RECOVERY trial.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813231/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That they are exclaiming against these supplements as cures is fine. They are not.
hlthe2b
Mar 2021
#2
Physicians must think Vit D is important or they would not constantly be testing our Vit D levels
womanofthehills
Mar 2021
#30
the OP sites opinion from McGill University in Canada--a known bastion of anti-CDC RW conservatism
hlthe2b
Mar 2021
#11
I try to myself, but as you age and in some individuals absorption/conversion is inadequate.
hlthe2b
Mar 2021
#12
Exactly. I have seen a number of Covid and Via D studies. I've never seen it claimed as a cure but
Dream Girl
Mar 2021
#32
Plus the OP is using RW sources, one that has historical ties to Trump's minion Pecker (hush money)
Celerity
Mar 2021
#39
McGill University is where the Trump plant, Paul Alexander hailed & Trump used to defuse CDC's
hlthe2b
Mar 2021
#8
This was interesting. People taking baby aspirn also had better outcomes when they did get covid
mitch96
Mar 2021
#21
My take is w/ those that take vit. D supplements, my doctor also recommended a daily dose of
SWBTATTReg
Mar 2021
#19
I live in an area that they recommend using Vit D because we get so little sun.
demigoddess
Mar 2021
#27
I thought the Vitamin D was to boost the immune system, making it harder to contract the COVID.
KewlKat
Mar 2021
#34
Normally science does not rely on one study to prove or not prove anything.
former9thward
Mar 2021
#35
Too many articles that start with "The truth about..." are followed by someone's opinion.
Binkie The Clown
Mar 2021
#37