Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author Ocelot II Mar 2021 #1
He was a Trump hire at State. struggle4progress Mar 2021 #8
Yup. QED. Ocelot II Mar 2021 #9
David Feith is Douglas Feith's son. David worked in the Trump State Department Klaralven Mar 2021 #17
I stand corrected. But David worked in the Trump admin Ocelot II Mar 2021 #20
More conspiracy theory idiocy. Jirel Mar 2021 #2
More uninformed knee-jerk opinions nt intrepidity Mar 2021 #7
Apparently you didn't see this the first time: lagomorph777 Mar 2021 #10
The source - David Feith - is known to have had problems with the truth, Ocelot II Mar 2021 #11
A fixture on FOX with not a pimple's worth of medical training or background hlthe2b Mar 2021 #3
Something's fishy here. lagomorph777 Mar 2021 #5
Indeed. hlthe2b Mar 2021 #6
Why are you spreading this false right-wing conspiracy theory today? lagomorph777 Mar 2021 #4
Hopefully DUers can still spot right wing conspiracy theories kcr Mar 2021 #12
I'm confident that time will tell nt intrepidity Mar 2021 #21
Still not looking good for you n/t kcr Mar 2021 #27
Lots of right-wing voices being pushed today. Huh. WhiskeyGrinder Mar 2021 #13
I wouldn't trust David Feith any farther than I can throw a grand piano. Ocelot II Mar 2021 #14
Now was that lab on a UFO that Big Foot was flying? Botany Mar 2021 #15
Op-Eds are not products of the paper's editorial staff. That said, thanks for providing his name... Hekate Mar 2021 #16
Settling down to the actual subject for a second ... Hugh_Lebowski Mar 2021 #18
Thank you for understanding and articulating the issue intrepidity Mar 2021 #22
It's controversial in part because we're all hyper-vigilant to the plight of AAPI in this country Hugh_Lebowski Mar 2021 #25
Understood, and in complete agreement intrepidity Mar 2021 #26
It's controversial in the same way every other q conspiracy quack theory is kcr Mar 2021 #28
Let me know when this is in the news section and not the opinion page (n/t) Spider Jerusalem Mar 2021 #19
WaPo prints RW opinion columnists regularly. You're welcome to blm Mar 2021 #23
I think I've seen six times you've posted this conspiracy theory nonsense today PSPS Mar 2021 #24
Were the others hit-and-run, too? dpibel Mar 2021 #29
Proportion of likelihood of a theory should always be supplied in all communications. gulliver Mar 2021 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WaPo Opinion: Did covid-1...»Reply #21