Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You know, simply put, there needs to be an adverse consequence for politicians who [View all]Bondor
(66 posts)15. A question of constitutional law
Is it possible to permit free speech regarding matters of opinion and judgment - such as how a given law might play out in future or who deserves what - while constraining speech that verifiably gets facts wrong?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You know, simply put, there needs to be an adverse consequence for politicians who [View all]
Atticus
Mar 2021
OP
A quiz show to ID faulty reasoning or conclusions, etc. What a great idea.
Trust_Reality
Mar 2021
#20
One that's not just for broadcast! That's the only way it would be effective.
CaptainTruth
Mar 2021
#51
No limits on free speech...I can only imagine how the GOP would subvert this...there is little we
Demsrule86
Mar 2021
#35
I wish class action lawsuits could be brought against those who outright lie.
CaptainTruth
Mar 2021
#47
The right wing media conditioning of the public set this situation up decades ago.
ancianita
Mar 2021
#5
conservatives only survive with a heavy dose of lies and their base demands those lies
LymphocyteLover
Mar 2021
#7
the huge problem is conservative media that allows Republicans to be accountability-free
LymphocyteLover
Mar 2021
#8
Will you accept some official body that has the power to determine what the "truth" is?
hack89
Mar 2021
#21
Apparently there is one source so feared for digging out the truth and publishing........
usaf-vet
Mar 2021
#33
For most, truth is truth, not "truth". It seems to me that our entire judicial system depends on
Atticus
Mar 2021
#45
Rachel Maddow has become the top cable news show by focusing on what they do, not what they say.
Trust_Reality
Mar 2021
#31
Agree, we prosecute other forms of fraud - Ponzi, broken contracts - why not lies and hoaxes?
bucolic_frolic
Mar 2021
#39
Democratic messaging needs to be effective enough that the vast majority...
CaptainTruth
Mar 2021
#46