General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You know, simply put, there needs to be an adverse consequence for politicians who [View all]malthaussen
(18,364 posts)Supposedly, in said "free market," politicians who are mendacious or incompetent would be rejected by the consumer of their political product. This works about as well as the soi-disant "free market" in other goods and services.
"Freedom of choice" is so systemically embedded in American culture (so long as we're not talking about abortion), that any remedy that limits choice is bound to bring howls of protest from every radical corner of the universe. As with many other problems in American society, you have to change the system and the expectations before changing behavior. Anything else is just band-aids.
Remember that the Roman Republic had censors to do much the same thing as you ask. Which worked about as well as one might expect, and spawned the always-useful question "Quo custodiet ipsos custodes?"
-- Mal