Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)

1. I think it's a similar principle as applies when they say you can't have a fully automatic weapon

Reply to bluestarone (Original post)

Wed Mar 24, 2021, 05:31 PM

Mar 2021

Of a grenade launcher for that matter.

Locales aren't barred from making certain restrictions on the carrying of firearms, nor of possession of various types of firearms.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The question i've always had of pertaining to gun control is (I'm completely FOR GUN CONTROL) [View all] bluestarone Mar 2021 OP

I think it's a similar principle as applies when they say you can't have a fully automatic weapon Hugh_Lebowski Mar 2021 #1

Actually grenade launchers are unregulated. fescuerescue Mar 2021 #12

....and especially at all Republican National and State Conventions Stallion Mar 2021 #2

You see that's how DUMB these QTHUGS are bluestarone Mar 2021 #4

and at the NRA conventions Darwins_Retriever Mar 2021 #11

I'm for ammunition control. roamer65 Mar 2021 #3

I'm ONLY for this IF it pertains to AK-47 type weapons bluestarone Mar 2021 #5

That ammo should be eliminated. roamer65 Mar 2021 #6

TRUE BUT bluestarone Mar 2021 #7

Too many existing guns and ammo. roamer65 Mar 2021 #8

There are no states where toting a gun is legal everywhere. SYFROYH Mar 2021 #9

Agree with this BUT bluestarone Mar 2021 #10

Congress people and judges fescuerescue Mar 2021 #13