'At Some Point, Litigation Must End': Another Federal Judge Dismisses Another Devin Nunes Lawsuit [View all]
In what has become a regularly reoccurring result, a lawsuit filed by Rep. Devin Nunes (R) and his attorney Steve Biss has been tossed out of court this time for good.
A federal judge in Virginia this week dismissed with prejudice the California congressmans complaint against Fusion GPS, the research and investigative firm behind the production of the Steele Dossier in 2016. The dismissal means Nunes will not be afforded the opportunity to amend any deficiencies and re-file the case. Nunes had previously filed three different versions of the lawsuit that were dismissed without prejudice.
Initially filed in 2019, the suit accused Fusion GPS, its founder Glenn Simpson, and watchdog group the Campaign for Accountability of ongoing and continuous racketeering activities as part of a joint and systematic effort to intimidate, harass, threaten, influence, interfere with, impede, and ultimately to derail Plaintiffs congressional investigation into Russian election interference. Citing the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, Nunes alleged that the defendants engaged in a broad plan to interfere with his official duties. Nunes also alleged that the defendants filed fraudulent ethics complaints against him that were solely designed to harass and intimidate.
But U.S. District Judge Rossie Alston of the Eastern District of Virginia, an appointee of Donald Trump himself, reasoned that Nunes failed to allege facts sufficient to show that any association-in-fact enterprise existed between the defendants as required to proceed under the civil RICO statute.
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/at-some-point-litigation-must-end-another-federal-judge-dismisses-another-devin-nunes-lawsuit/