Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Center for Effective Law Making: Highlights from the 116th Congress Legislative Effectiveness Scores [View all]lapucelle
(21,127 posts)7. Govtrack.us is also a reliable source for ratings and rankings.
2020 Report Cards
These statistics dissect the legislative records of Members of Congress during the 116th Congress (Jan 3, 2019-Jan 3, 2021), as of Jan 30, 2021.
These statistics dissect the legislative records of Members of Congress during the 116th Congress (Jan 3, 2019-Jan 3, 2021), as of Jan 30, 2021.
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/report-cards/2020
Find your members:
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Center for Effective Law Making: Highlights from the 116th Congress Legislative Effectiveness Scores [View all]
lapucelle
Apr 2021
OP
I didn't say their seats were LOST, I said we lost THEM. Are either still in the House?
George II
Apr 2021
#3
They didn't represent "America" they represented the New York City Metropolitan area....
George II
Apr 2021
#9
I'm talking about the House on the whole. Two reps are gone, replaced by Dems. IMO we lost nothing
Autumn
Apr 2021
#12
I don't know what else to tell you Autumn, but we lost 62 years' experience, which is NOT "nothing".
George II
Apr 2021
#13
Add up the total years of experience of all Dems, look at that and look where we are at.
Autumn
Apr 2021
#18
Seriously. I thought fundraising skills were bad because money in politics is very bad.
betsuni
Apr 2021
#42
Apparently "big money in politics" is good for some, bad for others. What would be interesting....
George II
Apr 2021
#54
That's not correct. Speaker Pelosi raised the most money among Democrats for both her own reelection
lapucelle
Apr 2021
#43
The study rates members on their effectiveness in Congress doing their jobs, not....
George II
Apr 2021
#58
Wait...what? "The study is not important"? Yes it is. We're Democrats. We like data.
lapucelle
Apr 2021
#46
It might be important to you. It isn't to me. That my opinion and I'll not change it.
Autumn
Apr 2021
#50
So then Autumn, on what do you base your opinion. That's a rather credible and detailed....
George II
Apr 2021
#56
I have never head of a chair of the appropriations committee to ever be ineffective, if one was
Autumn
Apr 2021
#57
Neither have I. Perhaps it's because their effectiveness qualified them to become the chair....
George II
Apr 2021
#59
Well for sure it's not often any politician will vote against funding the government
Autumn
Apr 2021
#60
Yes, it's not often that any politician would vote against funding the government.....
George II
Apr 2021
#61
Bernie Sanders: "We have got to look at candidates, you know, not by the color of their skin,
betsuni
Apr 2021
#40
'we define legislative effectiveness as "proven ability to advance a member's agenda
Hortensis
Apr 2021
#4
That's another good site, I use it a lot. And then there is Progressive Punch:
George II
Apr 2021
#14
That Progressive Punch site can be misleading. There are scores for "Lifetime" and....
George II
Apr 2021
#53
The Speaker and party leaders don't normally participate in the activities used to calculate....
George II
Apr 2021
#10
Yes. She rarely tweets and doesn't have a Twitch account, but plugs away at her job.
George II
Apr 2021
#33