General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I don't want to see women's athletics get the same degree of support as men's [View all]AZProgressive
(30,120 posts)Rutgers is always used as an example of some schools shouldn't pay so much for a football program. I found this.
NCAA rules allow White students and coaches to profit off labor of Black ones, study finds
The National Collegiate Athletic Associations long-standing policy prohibiting profit-sharing with college athletes effectively allows wealthy White students to profit off the labor of poor Black ones.
Thats the stark conclusion of a new working paper released by the National Bureau of Economic Research. The paper uses revenue and expense data for college athletic departments to trace the flow of billions in annual revenue generated by NCAA sports, particularly basketball and football.
The NCAA prohibits college athletes from being compensated for their labor. The rule is rooted in the concept of the student-athlete, a term the associations first executive director coined to help the NCAA fight against workmens compensation insurance claims for injured football players, as Jon Solomon, editorial director of the Aspen Institute Sports and Society Program, puts it.
(Snip)
But college sports today bear little resemblance to their amateur origins. Were talking about athletic departments with $100 million budgets, said Craig Garthwaite, lead author of the study. Thats a commercial enterprise. It is a modern business endeavor and we thought we should analyze it that way.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/09/07/ncaa-student-athletes-pay-equity/