Judge rules that publishing of revenge porn is protected by First Amendment

[CrackityJones75]

57. What is incorrect?

There are laws on the books about recording against someone’s knowledge. If someone gave someone else images and didn’t have some agreement in place that those images wouldn’t be shared with someone else... Well they are shit out of luck really.

It is awful that someone would use that to damage someone else. But thats why you don’t share images with people like that. If it was used to blackmail and get something from someone that would be extortion or bribery.

Otherwise if someone gives you something. Anything really, You are saying that the person that gave it to you has the right to tell you how you may use it. Forever. Even without an agreement?

It sucks but again without an agreement in place how do you expect to hold people accountable?